SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-155215"
 

Search: id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-155215" > A pilot study of me...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist
  • Smekal, DavidUppsala universitet,Anestesiologi och intensivvård (author)

A pilot study of mechanical chest compressions with the LUCAS (TM) device in cardiopulmonary resuscitation

  • Article/chapterEnglish2011

Publisher, publication year, extent ...

  • Elsevier BV,2011
  • printrdacarrier

Numbers

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:DiVA.org:uu-155215
  • https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-155215URI
  • https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.01.032DOI

Supplementary language notes

  • Language:English
  • Summary in:English

Part of subdatabase

Classification

  • Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype
  • Subject category:art swepub-publicationtype

Notes

  • Aim: The LUCASTM device has been shown to improve organ perfusion during cardiac arrest in experimental studies. In this pilot study the aim was to compare short-term survival between cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performed with mechanical chest compressions using the LUCASTM device and CPR performed with manual chest compressions. The intention was to use the results for power calculation in a larger randomised multicentre trial. Methods: In a prospective pilot study, from February 1, 2005, to April 1, 2007, 149 patients with out-of hospital cardiac arrest in two Swedish cities were randomised to mechanical chest compressions or standard CPR with manual chest compressions. Results: After exclusion, the LUCAS and the manual groups contained 75 and 73 patients, respectively. In the LUCAS and manual groups, spontaneous circulation with a palpable pulse returned in 30 and 23 patients (p = 0.30), spontaneous circulation with blood pressure above 80/50 mmHg remained for at least 5 min in 23 and 19 patients (p = 0.59), the number of patients hospitalised alive >4 h were 18 and 15 (p = 0.69), and the number discharged, alive 6 and 7 (p = 0.78), respectively. Conclusions: In this pilot study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients we found no difference in early survival between CPR performed with mechanical chest compression with the LUCASTM device and CPR with manual chest compressions. Data have been used for power calculation in a forthcoming multicentre trial.

Subject headings and genre

  • Cardiac arrest
  • Active compression-decompression (ACD)
  • Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)
  • Out-of-hospital CPR
  • Mechanical devices
  • Survival
  • Device
  • LUCAS
  • MEDICINE
  • MEDICIN

Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)

  • Johansson, JakobUppsala universitet,Anestesiologi och intensivvård(Swepub:uu)jakojoha (author)
  • Huzevka, TiborUppsala universitet,Anestesiologi och intensivvård (author)
  • Rubertsson, StenUppsala universitet,Anestesiologi och intensivvård(Swepub:uu)stenrube (author)
  • Uppsala universitetAnestesiologi och intensivvård (creator_code:org_t)

Related titles

  • In:Resuscitation: Elsevier BV82:6, s. 702-7060300-95721873-1570

Internet link

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Smekal, David
Johansson, Jakob
Huzevka, Tibor
Rubertsson, Sten
Articles in the publication
Resuscitation
By the university
Uppsala University

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view