SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

hsv:(ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY) hsv:(Environmental Biotechnology) hsv:(Bioethics)
 

Sökning: hsv:(ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY) hsv:(Environmental Biotechnology) hsv:(Bioethics) > Making researchers ...

Making researchers moral : Why institutionalised distrust might not work

JOHNSSON, LINUS, 1978- (författare)
Uppsala universitet,Centrum för forsknings- och bioetik
ERIKSSON, STEFAN (författare)
Uppsala universitet,Centrum för forsknings- och bioetik
HELGESSON, GERT (författare)
Stockholm Centre for Healthcare Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm
visa fler...
HANSSON, MATS G. (författare)
Uppsala universitet,Centrum för forsknings- och bioetik
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Engelska.
  • Annan publikation (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Research ethics, once a platform for declaring intent, discussing moral issues and providing advice and guidance to researchers, has developed over time into an extra-legal regulatory system, complete with steering documents, overseeing bodies, and formal procedures. The process of institutionalising distrust is usually motivated by reference to past atrocities committed in the name of research and the need to secure public trust. This paper examines some limitations of this approach. First, past atrocities cannot provide the necessary justification unless institutionalised distrust is a necessary or efficient means to prevent future ones; and there are several reasons to doubt that this is the case. Second, the efficacy of ethics review in safeguarding morally acceptable research depends on the moral competence and integrity of individual researchers—the kinds of qualities that institutionalised distrust calls into question. Third, ethics guidelines cannot, as it is sometimes assumed, educate or guide researchers to moral behaviour unless they already have considerable capacity for moral judgment. Fourth, institutionalised distrust is a potential threat to the moral competence and integrity of researchers by encouraging a blinkered view of ethical issues, inducing moral heteronomy through incentives, and alienating them to research ethics as a pursuable activity. We conclude that the moral problem posed by inappropriate short-term behaviour on behalf of researchers is dwarfed by the potential long-term consequences of allowing their moral competence to deteriorate. Measures must therefore be taken to ensure that researchers are equipped to take their individual responsibility and not obstructed from doing so.

Ämnesord

TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER  -- Miljöbioteknik -- Bioteknisk etik (hsv//swe)
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY  -- Environmental Biotechnology -- Bioethics (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

research ethics; moral responsibility; ethics review; ethics guidelines; institutionalised distrust; scientific misconduct
Bioetik
Bioethics

Publikations- och innehållstyp

vet (ämneskategori)
ovr (ämneskategori)

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy