SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

(WFRF:(Lindberg Per))
 

Search: (WFRF:(Lindberg Per)) > Validation of Smart...

  • Diaz Tartera, Hetzel O.Uppsala universitet,Gastroenterologi/hepatologi (author)

Validation of SmartPill® wireless motility capsule for gastrointestinaltransit time : Intra-subject variability, software accuracy and comparison with video capsule endoscopy

  • Article/chapterEnglish2017

Publisher, publication year, extent ...

  • 2017-05-19
  • Wiley,2017
  • printrdacarrier

Numbers

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:DiVA.org:uu-322579
  • https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-322579URI
  • https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.13107DOI
  • http://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:136596637URI

Supplementary language notes

  • Language:English
  • Summary in:English

Part of subdatabase

Classification

  • Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype
  • Subject category:art swepub-publicationtype

Notes

  • BACKGROUND: There is interest in ultimately combining endoscopy and motility assessments. Gastric emptying (GET), small bowel (SBTT), colon (CTT) and whole gut transit (WGTT) times are conveniently obtained by SmartPill® wireless motility capsule (WMC) that records luminal pH, temperature and pressure. Reproducibility within same subjects and accuracy of software derived times (MotiliGI® ) were investigated for diagnostic application. GET and SBTT were separately measured using video capsule endoscopy (VCE). The aim of this investigation was to assess same subject reproducibility of WMC, accuracy of software derived transit times and relate to Pillcam® SB (small bowel) VCE motility data.METHODS: Seventy three healthy adults ingested a 260 kcal mixed meal followed by WMC tests. Food intake was permitted after 6 hours. Regional transit data was obtained for GET, SBTT and CTT, the sum yielding WGTT. Nineteen subjects repeated WMC tests 2 or 4 weeks later; a separate 70 underwent VCE while fasted.KEY RESULTS: Visually derived data from WMC yielded GET 3.46±0.27, SBTT 5.15±0.21, CTT 20.76±1.19 and WGTT 29.53±1.28 hours (mean±SEM). Pearson's correlation coefficients (r) against software derived results were: GET 0.78 (P<.0001), SBTT 0.28 (P<.05), CTT 0.96 (P<.0001), WGTT 0.99 (P<.0001). VCE yielded lower GET (0.71±0.08 hours) and SBTT (4.15±0.13 hours).CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: GET, SBTT, CTT and WGTT obtained by WMC are commensurate with literature values, including by other methods. Visually and software derived transit times have strongest correlations for CTT and WGTT. WMC yields longer GET and SBTT than VCE, perhaps due to meal related effects on motility.

Subject headings and genre

Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)

  • Webb, Dominic-LucUppsala universitet,Gastroenterologi/hepatologi(Swepub:uu)domwe127 (author)
  • Al-Saffar, Anas,1969-Uppsala universitet,Gastroenterologi/hepatologi,Uppsala University(Swepub:uu)anaal104 (author)
  • Halim, Mohammed Abdul,1983-Uppsala universitet,Gastroenterologi/hepatologi(Swepub:uu)abdab535 (author)
  • Lindberg, GKarolinska Institutet (author)
  • Sangfelt, PerUppsala universitet,Gastroenterologi/hepatologi(Swepub:uu)persangf (author)
  • Hellström, Per M.,1954-Uppsala universitet,Gastroenterologi/hepatologi(Swepub:uu)perhe742 (author)
  • Uppsala universitetGastroenterologi/hepatologi (creator_code:org_t)

Related titles

  • In:Neurogastroenterology and Motility: Wiley29:101350-19251365-2982

Internet link

Find in a library

To the university's database

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view