SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-429511"
 

Search: id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-429511" > Information-making-...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist
  • Huvila, Isto,Professor,1976-Uppsala universitet,Institutionen för ABM (author)

Information-making-related information needs and the credibility of information

  • Article/chapterEnglish2020

Publisher, publication year, extent ...

  • 2020-12-15
  • University of Boras, Faculty of Librarianship, Information, Education and IT,2020
  • electronicrdacarrier

Numbers

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:DiVA.org:uu-429511
  • https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-429511URI
  • https://doi.org/10.47989/irisic2002DOI

Supplementary language notes

  • Language:English
  • Summary in:English

Part of subdatabase

Classification

  • Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype
  • Subject category:art swepub-publicationtype

Notes

  • Introduction. Even if trust in the process of how information is made has been acknowledged as a key aspect of the credibility of information, there is little earlier research on how and if people use or want information on information making when doing credibility assessments.Method. Swedish archaeology administrators were interviewed (n=10).Analysis. Interview transcripts were analysed using close reading and an approach based on the constant comparative method. Information needs relating to work processes, methods and technologies, context and situation and non-needs (i.e. lack of need) of information on information making were identified similarly to two types of reputational and four types of non-reputational cues of how information was made.Results. Experienced information needs about information making and preferences for reputational and non-reputational cues in credibility assessments were related to individuals’ epistemic distance to the context where information making took place, and if the interviewees positioned themselves as insiders or outsiders in that particular context.Conclusion. To understand the dynamics and interaction of credibility criteria, it can be useful to look at how and what they are used to justify and what are people’s underpinning epistemic beliefs, instead of merely pointing to the differences in beliefs and enumerating situation-specific credibility criteria. People’s flexibility in switching between reputational and non-reputational cues, and positioning themselves as insiders and outsiders, could be seen as an opportunity rather than as a sign of their inferior informational competences.

Subject headings and genre

Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)

  • Uppsala universitetInstitutionen för ABM (creator_code:org_t)

Related titles

  • In:Information research: University of Boras, Faculty of Librarianship, Information, Education and IT25:41368-1613

Internet link

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Huvila, Isto, Pr ...
About the subject
SOCIAL SCIENCES
SOCIAL SCIENCES
and Media and Commun ...
and Information Stud ...
Articles in the publication
Information rese ...
By the university
Uppsala University

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view