SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-444398"
 

Search: id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-444398" > Assessing Treatment...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist
  • Chasseloup, EstelleUppsala universitet,Institutionen för farmaci (author)

Assessing Treatment Effects with Pharmacometric Models : A New Method that Addresses Problems with Standard Assessments

  • Article/chapterEnglish2021

Publisher, publication year, extent ...

  • 2021-05-03
  • Springer,2021
  • electronicrdacarrier

Numbers

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:DiVA.org:uu-444398
  • https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-444398URI
  • https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-021-00596-8DOI

Supplementary language notes

  • Language:English
  • Summary in:English

Part of subdatabase

Classification

  • Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype
  • Subject category:art swepub-publicationtype

Notes

  • Longitudinal pharmacometric models offer many advantages in the analysis of clinical trial data, but potentially inflated type I error and biased drug effect estimates, as a consequence of model misspecifications and multiple testing, are main drawbacks. In this work, we used real data to compare these aspects for a standard approach (STD) and a new one using mixture models, called individual model averaging (IMA). Placebo arm data sets were obtained from three clinical studies assessing ADAS-Cog scores, Likert pain scores, and seizure frequency. By randomly (1:1) assigning patients in the above data sets to "treatment" or "placebo," we created data sets where any significant drug effect was known to be a false positive. Repeating the process of random assignment and analysis for significant drug effect many times (N = 1000) for each of the 40 to 66 placebo-drug model combinations, statistics of the type I error and drug effect bias were obtained. Across all models and the three data types, the type I error was (5th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 95th percentiles) 4.1, 11.4, 40.6, 100.0, 100.0 for STD, and 1.6, 3.5, 4.3, 5.0, 6.0 for IMA. IMA showed no bias in the drug effect estimates, whereas in STD bias was frequently present. In conclusion, STD is associated with inflated type I error and risk of biased drug effect estimates. IMA demonstrated controlled type I error and no bias.

Subject headings and genre

Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)

  • Tessier, AdrienInst Rech Int Servier, Div Quantitat Pharmacol, Suresnes, France. (author)
  • Karlsson, MatsUppsala universitet,Institutionen för farmaci(Swepub:uu)matskarl (author)
  • Uppsala universitetInstitutionen för farmaci (creator_code:org_t)

Related titles

  • In:AAPS Journal: Springer23:31550-7416

Internet link

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Chasseloup, Este ...
Tessier, Adrien
Karlsson, Mats
About the subject
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES
MEDICAL AND HEAL ...
and Basic Medicine
and Pharmaceutical S ...
Articles in the publication
AAPS Journal
By the university
Uppsala University

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view