Sökning: WFRF:(Gunningberg Lena)
> (2020-2024) >
Pressure ulcer risk...
Pressure ulcer risk assessment - registered nurses' experiences of using PURPOSE T : A focus group study
-
- Hultin, Lisa (författare)
- Uppsala universitet,Vårdvetenskap,Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
-
- Gunningberg, Lena, 1954- (författare)
- Uppsala universitet,Vårdvetenskap,Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
-
- Coleman, Susanne (författare)
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
-
visa fler...
-
- Karlsson, Ann-Christin (författare)
- Uppsala universitet,Vårdvetenskap,Region Gotland, Visby, Sweden
-
visa färre...
-
(creator_code:org_t)
- 2021-06-09
- 2022
- Engelska.
-
Ingår i: Journal of Clinical Nursing. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 0962-1067 .- 1365-2702. ; 31:1-2, s. 231-239
- Relaterad länk:
-
https://doi.org/10.1...
-
visa fler...
-
https://uu.diva-port... (primary) (Raw object)
-
https://onlinelibrar...
-
https://urn.kb.se/re...
-
https://doi.org/10.1...
-
visa färre...
Abstract
Ämnesord
Stäng
- AIM: To evaluate the clinical usability of PURPOSE T among registered nurses in Sweden.BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcers are an adverse event and a problem worldwide. Risk assessment is a cornerstone, and a first step in pressure ulcer prevention is to identify possible risk patients and/or pressure ulcers. There are many pressure ulcer risk assessment instruments; however, they are not updated and/or evidence-based. PURPOSE T has been psychometrically evaluated in the UK and in Sweden with good inter-rater and test-retest reliability, and convergent validity was reported as moderate.DESIGN: A descriptive study design with a qualitative approach.METHODS: A total of six focus group interviews with 29 registered nurses were conducted. They were recruited from May 2018 to November 2018 from a university hospital and two nursing homes in Sweden. Data analysis was performed as described by Krueger. The study adheres to the COREQ guidelines.RESULTS: Four categories were identified: "An efficient risk assessment instrument performed at the bedside," "Deeper understanding and awareness of risk factors," "Benefits compared to the Modified Norton Scale" and "Necessity of integration of PURPOSE T in the electronic health record and team collaboration."CONCLUSION: The registered nurses acknowledged an overall positive perception of PURPOSE T's clinical usability. Future research is needed to evaluate the feasibility of PURPOSE T.RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: PURPOSE T has the potential to replace outdated pressure ulcers risk assessment instruments that are used today.
Ämnesord
- MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP -- Klinisk medicin -- Gastroenterologi (hsv//swe)
- MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES -- Clinical Medicine -- Gastroenterology and Hepatology (hsv//eng)
- MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP -- Hälsovetenskap -- Omvårdnad (hsv//swe)
- MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES -- Health Sciences -- Nursing (hsv//eng)
Nyckelord
- Focus groups
- nurses
- pressure ulcer
- risk assessment
- usability
Publikations- och innehållstyp
- ref (ämneskategori)
- art (ämneskategori)
Hitta via bibliotek
Till lärosätets databas