SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

L773:1097 0258 OR L773:0277 6715
 

Search: L773:1097 0258 OR L773:0277 6715 > Causal inference in...

Causal inference in survival analysis under deterministic missingness of confounders in register data

Ciocanea-Teodorescu, Iuliana (author)
Goetghebeur, Els (author)
Waernbaum, Ingeborg, 1972- (author)
Uppsala universitet,Statistiska institutionen
show more...
Schön, Staffan (author)
Gabriel, Erin E. (author)
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2023-03-08
2023
English.
In: Statistics in Medicine. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 0277-6715 .- 1097-0258. ; 42:12, s. 1946-1964
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Long-term register data offer unique opportunities to explore causal effects of treatments on time-to-event outcomes, in well-characterized populations with minimum loss of follow-up. However, the structure of the data may pose methodological challenges. Motivated by the Swedish Renal Registry and estimation of survival differences for renal replacement therapies, we focus on the particular case when an important confounder is not recorded in the early period of the register, so that the entry date to the register deterministically predicts confounder missingness. In addition, an evolving composition of the treatment arms populations, and suspected improved survival outcomes in later periods lead to informative administrative censoring, unless the entry date is appropriately accounted for. We investigate different consequences of these issues on causal effect estimation following multiple imputation of the missing covariate data. We analyse the performance of different combinations of imputation models and estimation methods for the population average survival. We further evaluate the sensitivity of our results to the nature of censoring and misspecification of fitted models. We find that an imputation model including the cumulative baseline hazard, event indicator, covariates and interactions between the cumulative baseline hazard and covariates, followed by regression standardization, leads to the best estimation results overall, in simulations. Standardization has two advantages over inverse probability of treatment weighting here: it can directly account for the informative censoring by including the entry date as a covariate in the outcome model, and allows for straightforward variance computation using readily available software.

Subject headings

NATURVETENSKAP  -- Matematik -- Sannolikhetsteori och statistik (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Mathematics -- Probability Theory and Statistics (hsv//eng)

Keyword

causal inference
confounder
deterministic missingness
register data
survival analysis

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view