SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Linder Gustav)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Linder Gustav) > Differences in mult...

Differences in multidisciplinary cancer conferences of esophageal and gastroesophageal junctional cancer regarding staging, resectability and treatment allocation – a multicenter study

Jestin Hannan, Christine (författare)
Uppsala universitet,Institutionen för kirurgiska vetenskaper,Department of surgery, Visby lasarett
León Risso, Solange (författare)
Uppsala universitet,Institutionen för kirurgiska vetenskaper
Lindblad, Mats (författare)
Division of surgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet
visa fler...
Loizou, Louiza (författare)
Division of Radiology, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet
Szabo, Eva (författare)
Department of clinical sciences, Örebro University
Edholm, David (författare)
Department of biomedical and clinical sciences, Linköping university
Claus Bartholomä, Wolf (författare)
Department of biomedical and clinical sciences, Linköping university
Åkesson, Oscar (författare)
Department of surgical sciences, Lund University
Lindberg, Fredrik (författare)
Department of Surgery and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University
Strandberg, Sara (författare)
Department of radiation sciences, Diagnostic Radiology, Umeå University
Linder, Gustav (författare)
Uppsala universitet,Institutionen för kirurgiska vetenskaper
Hedberg, Jakob (författare)
Uppsala universitet,Institutionen för kirurgiska vetenskaper
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Engelska.
  • Annan publikation (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Background: There are differences in esophageal cancer care across different regions in Sweden. According to Swedish national guidelines, all patients diagnosed with these tumors should be individually evaluated by regional multidisciplinary cancer conferences (MCCs) to be recommended best possible treatment. The aim of the study was to investigate differences between the regional MCCs in Sweden regarding clinical staging and recommended treatment.Method: Representatives for all six regional MCCs were invited to contribute with ten retrospective consecutive cases each. After anonymization radiological investigations were presented, along with the original case-specific medical history, anew at all participating regional MCCs. Each MCCs’ clinical Tumor Nodal Metastasis classification (cTNM) and treatment recommendation (curative, palliative or best supportive care) were compared between MCCs as well as with the original assessment. Results: Five regional MCCs joined the study. Out of 50 available cases the majority were assessed anew in addition to the previous original assessment. There was not consensus among the regional MCCs regarding cT-stage in 42 cases (84%), cN-stage in 33 cases (66%), and for cM-stage in 16 cases (32%). Differences in appraisal were not associated with PET-CT availability. The MCCs agreed on treatment recommendations in 26/50 cases (52%). Discussion: The study shows differences, both in assessment of cTNM as well as treatment recommendations at different MCCs. A patient recommended curative treatment by one MCC could be suggested palliative care by another. To achieve more equal care for esophageal cancer patients in Sweden it is essential to increase consensus on cTNM and recommended treatment. 

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Kirurgi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Surgery (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Esophageal cancer
Multidisciplinary cancer conference
Clinical staging

Publikations- och innehållstyp

vet (ämneskategori)
ovr (ämneskategori)

Till lärosätets databas

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy