SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

WFRF:(Glaudemans Andor W J M)
 

Search: WFRF:(Glaudemans Andor W J M) > (2024) > A systematic review...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist
  • Besson, Florent L (author)

A systematic review for the evidence of recommendations and guidelines in hybrid nuclear cardiovascular imaging.

  • Article/chapterEnglish2024

Publisher, publication year, extent ...

  • 2024
  • 2024
  • printrdacarrier

Numbers

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:DiVA.org:uu-521122
  • https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-521122URI
  • https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-024-06597-xDOI

Supplementary language notes

  • Language:English
  • Summary in:English

Part of subdatabase

Classification

  • Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype
  • Subject category:art swepub-publicationtype

Notes

  • OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the level of evidence of expert recommendations and guidelines for clinical indications and procedurals in hybrid nuclear cardiovascular imaging.METHODS: From inception to August 2023, a PubMed literature analysis of the latest version of guidelines for clinical hybrid cardiovascular imaging techniques including SPECT(/CT), PET(/CT), and PET(/MRI) was performed in two categories: (1) for clinical indications for all-in primary diagnosis; subgroup in prognosis and therapy evaluation; and for (2) imaging procedurals. We surveyed to what degree these followed a standard methodology to collect the data and provide levels of evidence, and for which topic systematic review evidence was executed.RESULTS: A total of 76 guidelines, published between 2013 and 2023, were included. The evidence of guidelines was based on systematic reviews in 7.9% of cases, non-systematic reviews in 47.4% of cases, a mix of systematic and non-systematic reviews in 19.7%, and 25% of guidelines did not report any evidence. Search strategy was reported in 36.8% of cases. Strengths of recommendation were clearly reported in 25% of guidelines. The notion of external review was explicitly reported in 23.7% of cases. Finally, the support of a methodologist was reported in 11.8% of the included guidelines.CONCLUSION: The use of evidence procedures for developing for evidence-based cardiovascular hybrid imaging recommendations and guidelines is currently suboptimal, highlighting the need for more standardized methodological procedures.

Subject headings and genre

  • Cardiovascular guidelines
  • Evidence-based practice
  • Hybrid imaging
  • Positron emission tomography
  • Recommendations

Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)

  • Treglia, Giorgio (author)
  • Bucerius, Jan (author)
  • Anagnostopoulos, Constantinos (author)
  • Buechel, Ronny R (author)
  • Dweck, Marc R (author)
  • Erba, Paula A (author)
  • Gaemperli, Oliver (author)
  • Gimelli, Alessia (author)
  • Gheysens, Olivier (author)
  • Glaudemans, Andor W J M (author)
  • Habib, Gilbert (author)
  • Hyafil, Fabian (author)
  • Lubberink, MarkUppsala universitet,Radiologi(Swepub:uu)marklubb (author)
  • Rischpler, Christopher (author)
  • Saraste, Antti (author)
  • Slart, Riemer H J A (author)
  • Uppsala universitetRadiologi (creator_code:org_t)

Related titles

  • In:European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging1619-70701619-7089

Internet link

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view