Sökning: WFRF:(Riggare Sara) >
Why publish? :
Why publish? : An interview study exploring patient innovators’ reasons for and experiences of scientific publishing
-
Dahlberg, Marie (författare)
-
- Luckhaus, Jamie Linnea (författare)
- Uppsala universitet,E-hälsa och hälsodata
-
Hasson, Henna (författare)
-
visa fler...
-
Jansson, Hanna (författare)
-
Lek, Madelen (författare)
-
Savage, Carl (författare)
-
- Riggare, Sara, PhD, 1971- (författare)
- Uppsala universitet,E-hälsa och hälsodata,Centrum för forskning om funktionshinder
-
Wannheden, Carolina (författare)
-
visa färre...
-
(creator_code:org_t)
- BioMed Central (BMC), 2024
- 2024
- Engelska.
-
Ingår i: Research Involvement and Engagement. - : BioMed Central (BMC). - 2056-7529. ; 10:1
- Relaterad länk:
-
https://doi.org/10.1...
-
visa fler...
-
https://uu.diva-port... (primary) (Raw object)
-
https://urn.kb.se/re...
-
https://doi.org/10.1...
-
visa färre...
Abstract
Ämnesord
Stäng
- Background: Scientific publications featuring patient-driven innovations (i.e., innovations that are developed and driven by patients or informal caregivers) are increasing. By understanding patient innovators' experiences of research publication, the scientific community may be better prepared to support or partner with patient innovators. Thus, the aim of this study was to explore patient innovators' reasons for and experiences of authoring scientific publications about their innovations.Methods: Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 international patient innovators from three continents who had published in scientific journals. Participants were identified through a scoping review on patient-driven innovations and snowball sampling. Interviews were conducted from June to October 2022 and the data was analyzed using the Framework Method.Findings: Participants' reasons for publishing in scientific journals were to strengthen the roles and voices of patients and informal caregivers, and to get recognition for their innovations. Some published as a response to serendipitous opportunities. Several positive experiences were reported: collaborations defined by transparency, mutual respect, and meaningful participation; learning and competence development; and gained confidence regarding the value of lived experiences in research. Participants also reported negative experiences, such as cultural barriers manifested as conservatism in academia and power imbalances between participants and researchers, and structural barriers regarding academic affiliations and research funding.Conclusions: Despite progress in increasing patient and public involvement in research and publication, our study found that patient innovators still experience barriers. This suggests that continued efforts are needed to facilitate contributions from patient innovators and other public actors to the production of relevant and meaningful research.
Ämnesord
- MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP -- Hälsovetenskap -- Hälso- och sjukvårdsorganisation, hälsopolitik och hälsoekonomi (hsv//swe)
- MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES -- Health Sciences -- Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy (hsv//eng)
Nyckelord
- Patient agency
- Patient and public involvement
- Patient author
- Patient-driven innovations
Publikations- och innehållstyp
- ref (ämneskategori)
- art (ämneskategori)
Hitta via bibliotek
Till lärosätets databas