SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

WFRF:(Merckelbach Harald)
 

Search: WFRF:(Merckelbach Harald) > A call for evidence...

A call for evidence-based security tools

Meijer, E (author)
Verschuere, B (author)
Merckelbach, Harald (author)
show more...
Smulders, F (author)
Leal, Sharon (author)
Ben-Shakar, G (author)
Granhag, Pär-Anders, 1964 (author)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Psykologiska institutionen,Department of Psychology
Gamer, M (author)
Gronau, N (author)
Vossel, G (author)
Crombz, G (author)
Spence, S (author)
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2009
2009
English.
In: Open Access Journal of Forensic Psychology. - 1948-5115. ; 1:1, s. 1-4
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Since the 2001 attacks on the twin towers, policies on security have changed drastically, bringing about an increased need for tools that allow for the detection of deception. Many of the solutions offered today, however, lack scientific underpinning. We recommend two important changes to improve the (cost) effectiveness of security policy. To begin with, the emphasis of deception research should shift from technological to behavioural sciences. Secondly, the burden of proof should lie with the manufacturers of the security tools. Governments should not rely on security tools that have not passed scientific scrutiny, and should only employ those methods that have been proven effective. After all, the use of tools that do not work will only get us further from the truth.

Keyword

security policy
lie detection
deception detection
behavioral science
terrorism

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view