SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

(WFRF:(Carlsson Fredrik 1972 )) srt2:(2010)
 

Search: (WFRF:(Carlsson Fredrik 1972 )) srt2:(2010) > A Fair Share : Burd...

A Fair Share : Burden-Sharing Preferences in the United States and China

Carlsson, Fredrik, 1968 (author)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för nationalekonomi med statistik, Enheten för miljöekonomi,Department of Economics, Environmental Economics Unit
Kataria, Mitesh (author)
Krupnick, Alan (author)
show more...
Lampi, Elina, 1967 (author)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för nationalekonomi med statistik, Enheten för miljöekonomi,Department of Economics, Environmental Economics Unit
Löfgren, Åsa, 1972 (author)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för nationalekonomi med statistik, Enheten för miljöekonomi,Department of Economics, Environmental Economics Unit
Qin, Ping, 1976 (author)
Sterner, Thomas, 1952 (author)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för nationalekonomi med statistik, Enheten för miljöekonomi,Department of Economics, Environmental Economics Unit
Chung, Susie (author)
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Göteborg : University of Gothenburg, 2010
English.
Series: Working Papers in Economics (online), 1403-2465 ; 471
  • Reports (other academic/artistic)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Using a choice experiment, we investigated preferences for distributing the economic burden of decreasing CO2 emissions in the two largest CO2-emitting countries: the United States and China. We asked respondents about their preferences for four burden-sharing rules to reduce CO2 emissions according to their country’s 1) historical emissions, 2) income level, 3) equal right to emit per person, and 4) current emissions. We found that U.S. respondents preferred the rule based on current emissions, while the equal right to emit rule was clearly least preferred. The Chinese respondents, on the other hand, preferred the historical rule, while the current emissions rule was the least preferred. Respondents overall favored the rule that was least costly for their country. These marked differences may explain the difficulties countries face in agreeing how to share costs, presenting a tough hurdle to overcome in future negotiations. We also found that the strength of the preferences was much stronger in China, suggesting that how mitigation costs are shared across countries is more important there.

Subject headings

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Ekonomi och näringsliv -- Nationalekonomi (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Economics and Business -- Economics (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Climate
burden-sharing
fairness
China
United States

Publication and Content Type

vet (subject category)
rap (subject category)

To the university's database

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view