The Relationship Between Facilitators’ Questions and the Level of Reflection in Postsimulation Debriefing

↓ Direkt till sidans innehåll
↓ Direkt till sidans sekundära innehåll (sidomenyn)

Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/174789" > The Relationship Be...

1 av 1
Föregående post
Nästa post
Till träfflistan

Eikeland Husebö, SisselGothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för pedagogik, kommunikation och lärande,Linnécentret for forskning om lärande (LinCS),Department of Education, Communication and Learning,The Linnaeus Centre for Research on Learning, Interaction, and Mediated Communication in Contemporary Society (LinCS) (författare)

The Relationship Between Facilitators’ Questions and the Level of Reflection in Postsimulation Debriefing

Artikel/kapitelEngelska2013

Förlag, utgivningsår, omfång ...

2013

Nummerbeteckningar

LIBRIS-ID:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/174789
https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/174789URI
https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e31827cbb5cDOI

Kompletterande språkuppgifter

Språk:engelska

Ingår i deldatabas

SwePubSwePub

Klassifikation

Ämneskategori:ref swepub-contenttype
Ämneskategori:art swepub-publicationtype

Anmärkningar

Introduction: Simulation-based education is a learner-active method that may en- hance teamwork skills such as leadership and communication. The importance of postsimulation debriefing to promote reflection is well accepted, but many questions concerning whether and how faculty promote reflection remain largely unanswered in the research literature. The aim of this study was therefore to explore the depth of re- flection expressed in questions by facilitators and responses from nursing students during postsimulation debriefings. Methods: Eighty-one nursing students and 4 facilitators participated. The data were collected in February and March 2008, the analysis being conducted on 24 video- recorded debriefings from simulated resuscitation teamwork involving nursing students only. Using Gibbs’ reflective cycle, we graded the facilitators’ questions and nursing students’ responses into stages of reflection and then correlated these. Results: Facilitators asked most evaluative and fewest emotional questions, whereas nursing students answered most evaluative and analytic responses and fewest emotional responses. The greatest difference between facilitators and nursing students was in the analytic stage. Only 23 (20%) of 117 questions asked by the facilitators were analytic, whereas 45 (35%) of 130 students’ responses were rated as analytic. Nevertheless, the facilitators’ descriptive questions also elicited student responses in other stages such as evaluative and analytic responses. Conclusion: We found that postsimulation debriefings provide students with the op- portunity to reflect on their simulation experience. Still, if the debriefing is going to pave the way for student reflection, it is necessary to work further on structuring the debriefing to facilitate deeper reflection. Furthermore, it is important that facilitators consider what kind of questions they ask to promote reflection. We think future research on debriefing should focus on developing an analytical framework for grading reflective questions. Such research will inform and support facilitators in devising strategies for the promotion of learning through reflection in postsimulation debriefings. (Sim Healthcare 00:00Y00, 2013) Key Words: Debriefing, Simulation, Reflection, Facilitators

Ämnesord och genrebeteckningar

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP Utbildningsvetenskap Lärande hsv//swe
SOCIAL SCIENCES Educational Sciences Learning hsv//eng
Debriefing
Simulation
Reflection
Facilitators

Biuppslag (personer, institutioner, konferenser, titlar ...)

Rystedt, Hans,1951Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Linnécentret for forskning om lärande (LinCS),Institutionen för pedagogik, kommunikation och lärande,The Linnaeus Centre for Research on Learning, Interaction, and Mediated Communication in Contemporary Society (LinCS),Department of Education, Communication and Learning(Swepub:gu)xrysha (författare)
Friberg, Febe,1950Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för vårdvetenskap och hälsa,Centrum för personcentrerad vård vid Göteborgs universitet (GPCC),Institute of Health and Care Sciences,University of Gothenburg Centre for person-centred care (GPCC)(Swepub:gu)xfrife (författare)
Dieckmann, Peter (författare)
Söreide, Eldar (författare)
Göteborgs universitetInstitutionen för pedagogik, kommunikation och lärande (creator_code:org_t)

Sammanhörande titlar

Ingår i:Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare8:3, s. 135-421559-23321559-713X

Internetlänk

Hitta via bibliotek

Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcar... (Sök värdpublikationen i LIBRIS)

Till lärosätets databas

1 av 1
Föregående post
Nästa post
Till träfflistan

Hitta mer i SwePub

Av författaren/redakt...: Eikeland Husebö, ...; Rystedt, Hans, 1 ...; Friberg, Febe, 1 ...; Dieckmann, Peter; Söreide, Eldar

Om ämnet

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP: SAMHÄLLSVETENSKA ...; och Utbildningsveten ...; och Lärande

Artiklar i publikationen: Simulation in He ...

Av lärosätet: Göteborgs universitet

Sök utanför SwePub

Sök vidare i:: Google; Google Book Search; Google Scholar

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

LIBRIS.kb.se