Interviewing to detect deception: When to disclose the evidence?

↓ Direkt till sidans innehåll
↓ Direkt till sidans sekundära innehåll (sidomenyn)

Search: L773:0882 0783 OR L773:1936 6469 > Interviewing to det...

Details
MARC

M, Sorochinski (author)

Interviewing to detect deception: When to disclose the evidence?

Article/chapterEnglish2014

Publisher, publication year, extent ...

2013-03-16
Springer Science and Business Media LLC,2014

Numbers

LIBRIS-ID:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/203901
https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/203901URI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-013-9121-2DOI

Supplementary language notes

Language:English

Part of subdatabase

SwePubSwePub

Classification

Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype
Subject category:art swepub-publicationtype

Notes

Research shows that there are few objective cues to deception. However, it may be possible to create such cues by strategic interviewing techniques. Strategic Use of Evidence (SUE) is one such technique. The basic premise of the SUE technique is that liars and truth tellers employ different counter-interrogation strategies, and that the evidence against the suspect can be used to exploit these differences in strategies. This study examined the effect of the timing of evidence disclosure (early vs. late vs. gradual) on verbal cues to deception. We predicted that late disclosure would be most effective in differentiating between liars and truth-tellers, and that cues to deception in the gradual disclosure condition would progressively disappear due to the suspects’ realization that evidence against them exists. That is, we expected that liars in the gradual presentation condition would become more consistent with the evidence over time. A sample of 86 undergraduate students went through a mock-terrorism paradigm (half innocent, half guilty), and were subsequently interviewed using one of three disclosure strategies: early, gradual, and late disclosure. We measured statement-evidence inconsistencies as cues to deception . Results supported our predictions in that cues to deception were most pronounced in the late disclosure condition. Contrary to our expectations, the results suggested that presenting the evidence gradually may put innocent suspects at a higher risk of misclassification as they seem to adopt a strategy that is more similar to guilty suspects.

Subject headings and genre

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP Psykologi hsv//swe
SOCIAL SCIENCES Psychology hsv//eng
Strategic Use of Evidence
Interviewing

Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)

Hartwig, Maria,1981 (author)
J, Osborn (author)
E, Wilkins (author)
E, Marsh (author)
D, Kazakov (author)
Granhag, Pär-Anders,1964Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Psykologiska institutionen,Department of Psychology(Swepub:gu)xgrapa (author)
Göteborgs universitetPsykologiska institutionen (creator_code:org_t)

Related titles

In:Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology: Springer Science and Business Media LLC29:2, s. 87-940882-07831936-6469

Internet link

Find in a library

Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology (Search for host publication in LIBRIS)

To the university's database

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor: M, Sorochinski; Hartwig, Maria, ...; J, Osborn; E, Wilkins; E, Marsh; D, Kazakov; show more...; Granhag, Pär-And ...; show less...

About the subject

SOCIAL SCIENCES: SOCIAL SCIENCES; and Psychology

Articles in the publication: Journal of Polic ...

By the university: University of Gothenburg

Search outside SwePub

Extend your search to:: Google; Google Book Search; Google Scholar

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

LIBRIS.kb.se