SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

id:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/215885"
 

Search: id:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/215885" > Osteoporosis: the e...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist
  • Lorentzon, Mattias,1970Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för medicin, avdelningen för invärtesmedicin och klinisk nutrition,Institute of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition (author)

Osteoporosis: the evolution of a diagnosis.

  • Article/chapterEnglish2015

Publisher, publication year, extent ...

  • 2015-05-25
  • Wiley,2015

Numbers

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/215885
  • https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/215885URI
  • https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.12369DOI

Supplementary language notes

  • Language:English

Part of subdatabase

Classification

  • Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype
  • Subject category:art swepub-publicationtype

Notes

  • The global trend toward increased longevity has resulted in aging populations and a rise in diseases or conditions that primarily affect older persons. One such condition is osteoporosis (fragile or porous bones), which causes an increased fracture risk. Vertebral and hip fractures lead to increased morbidity and mortality and result in enormous healthcare costs. Here we review the evolution of the diagnosis of osteoporosis. In an attempt to separate patients with normal bones from those with osteoporosis and to define the osteoporosis diagnosis, multiple factors and characteristics have been considered. These include pathology and histology of the disease, the endocrine regulation of bone metabolism, bone mineral density (BMD), fracture type or trauma severity, risk models for fracture prediction, and thresholds for pharmacological intervention. The femoral neck BMD -2.5 SDs cut-off for the diagnosis of osteoporosis is arbitrarily chosen, and there is no evidence to support the notion that fracture location (except vertebral fractures) or severity is useful to discriminate osteoporotic from normal bones. Fracture risk models (including factors unrelated to bone) dissociate bone strength from the diagnosis, and treatment thresholds are often based on health-economic considerations rather than bone properties. Vertebral fractures are a primary feature of osteoporosis, characterized by decreased bone mass, strength, and quality and a high risk of another such fracture that can be considerably reduced by treatment. We believe that the 2001 definition of osteoporosis by the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis is still valid and useful: 'Osteoporosis is defined as a skeletal disorder characterized by compromised bone strength predisposing a person to an increased risk of fracture'. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Subject headings and genre

Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)

  • Cummings, S (author)
  • Göteborgs universitetInstitutionen för medicin, avdelningen för invärtesmedicin och klinisk nutrition (creator_code:org_t)

Related titles

  • In:Journal of internal medicine: Wiley277:6, s. 650-6611365-27960954-6820

Internet link

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Lorentzon, Matti ...
Cummings, S
About the subject
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES
MEDICAL AND HEAL ...
and Clinical Medicin ...
Articles in the publication
Journal of inter ...
By the university
University of Gothenburg

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view