SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

WFRF:(Gutke Annelie)
 

Search: WFRF:(Gutke Annelie) > Treatments for preg...

  • Gutke, AnnelieLinköpings universitet,Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för neurovetenskap och fysiologi, sektionen för hälsa och rehabilitering,Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Health and Rehabilitation,Avdelningen för fysioterapi,Medicinska fakulteten,University of Gothenburg, Sweden (author)

Treatments for pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain: a systematic review of physiotherapy modalities

  • Article/chapterEnglish2015

Publisher, publication year, extent ...

  • 2015-06-16
  • Wiley,2015

Numbers

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/225372
  • https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/225372URI
  • https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12681DOI
  • https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-122514URI

Supplementary language notes

  • Language:English

Part of subdatabase

Classification

  • Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype
  • Subject category:for swepub-publicationtype

Notes

  • ObjectiveTo explore the effect of physiotherapeutic interventions on pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain. Material and methodsData sources: MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PEDro, CINAHL, AMED, and SCOPUS databases were searched up to December 2014 for studies written in English, French, German or Scandinavian languages that evaluated physiotherapeutic modalities for preventing and treating pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain. ResultsFor lumbopelvic pain during pregnancy, the evidence was strong for positive effects of acupuncture and pelvic belts. The evidence was low for exercise in general and for specific stabilizing exercises. The evidence was very limited for efficacy of water gymnastics, progressive muscle relaxation, a specific pelvic tilt exercise, osteopathic manual therapy, craniosacral therapy, electrotherapy and yoga. For postpartum lumbopelvic pain, the evidence was very limited for clinic-based treatment concepts, including specific stabilizing exercises, and for self-management interventions for women with severe disabilities. No specific adverse events were reported for any intervention. No meta-analysis could be performed because of study heterogeneity. ConclusionsThe levels of evidence were strong for a positive effect of acupuncture and pelvic belts, but weak for an effect of specific exercises. Caution should prevail in choosing other interventions for pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain.

Subject headings and genre

Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)

  • Betten, C.Primary Hlth Care, Skurup, Region Skane, Sweden (author)
  • Degerskar, K.Primary Hlth Care, Lund, Region Skane, Sweden (author)
  • Pousette, S.Private Clin Friskispraktiken, Sweden (author)
  • Fagevik Olsén, Monika,1964Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för neurovetenskap och fysiologi, sektionen för hälsa och rehabilitering,Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Health and Rehabilitation,University of Gothenburg, Sweden; Sahlgrens University Hospital, Sweden(Swepub:gu)xfagmo (author)
  • Göteborgs universitetInstitutionen för neurovetenskap och fysiologi, sektionen för hälsa och rehabilitering (creator_code:org_t)

Related titles

  • In:Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica: Wiley94:11, s. 1156-11670001-63491600-0412

Internet link

Find in a library

To the university's database

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view