SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Gross Mechthild M)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Gross Mechthild M) > (2017) > A systematic litera...

A systematic literature review of computer-based behavioural change interventions to inform the design of an online VBAC intervention for the OptiBIRTH European randomized trial.

Sinclair, Marlene (författare)
Stockdale, Janine (författare)
Holman, Mary Rose (författare)
visa fler...
Brown, Mary Jane (författare)
Morano, Sandra (författare)
Gross, Mechthild M (författare)
Lundgren, Ingela, 1957 (författare)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för vårdvetenskap och hälsa,Institute of Health and Care Sciences
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2017
2017
Engelska.
Ingår i: Evidence Based Midwifery. - 1479-4489. ; 15:1, s. 5-13
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Aim: The aim of this research was o systematically review computer-based, behavior change (BC) interventions during pregnancy and their design components in order to determine their best application within the context of the OptiBIRTH intervention. Design: A systematic literature review was undertaken using the Cochrane collaboration guidelines for systematic reviews of health promotion and public health interventions. Literature searches were conducted in; Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, PsycINFO, from database inception to June 2015. Cochrane Risk of Bias criteria was applied to assess the methodological quality of the papers and a taxonomy of BC techniques was used to appraise the interventions. PICO. Participants included healthy pregnant women who were ≥18 years old. The types of intervention used were computer-based interventions designed to facilitate a BC approach in a sample of pregnant women. The comparison was routine antenatal care. The primary outcome included improved health behavior(s), as an indicator of the intention behind the intervention design. Results. A total of 343 papers were identified through database-searching and hand- searching methods; 80 duplicates were removed. From the remaining 263, 244 did not explicitly address the subject under review. Therefore, 19 full text articles were assessed for eligibility; 16 did not meet eligibility criteria and were excluded at this stage. This resulted in a total of three studies being selected for inclusion in this review (Jackson et al, 2011; Tzilos et al, 2011; Tsoh et al, 2010). The computer-based interventions were designed to bring about BC in relation to alcohol consumption, smoking or diet and exercise during pregnancy. Interventions delivered varied between two types; purely computer-delivered (Tzilos et al. 2011) or a combination of both computer plus face-to-face input (Jackson et al, 2011; Tsoh et al. 2010). Techniques used included motivational interviewing, problem solving cognitive dissonance and goal setting. Types of measurement outcomes varied but were all self-reported behavioral outcomes. Statistically significant improvements in behavioral outcomes were seen in the interventions by Jackson et al (2011) and Tsoh et al (2011), but not in the intervention by Tzilos et al (2011). The GRADE analysis identified that all studies combined lacked blinding and relied on self-reported data increasing risk of bias. Conclusion. This systematic review reports on the best available evidence and theory to design an online component of a complex intervention for use in an RCT to enhance women´s shared decision-making experience about vaginal births after caesarean (VBAC). The review reports the differences between the observed BC approach and that of a decision-making being focused on a more healthy option. As a result, techniques designed to create dissonance are considered appropriate. Shared decision-making, however, is conceptually different, in that the goal is to facilitate a woman in discovering the best direction of travel for her as person. Therefore, the authors argue that it is crucial for healthcare professionals designing complex healthcare interventions (either BC techniques or shared decision-making) to ensure that a person´s self-determination is respected through having access to relevant and understandable information and healthcare professionals who understand a woman´s motivation. However, it is not possible to draw firm conclusions from three studies and there is a requirement for further research.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Hälsovetenskap -- Omvårdnad (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Health Sciences -- Nursing (hsv//eng)
MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Reproduktionsmedicin och gynekologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine (hsv//eng)
MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Annan medicin och hälsovetenskap (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Other Medical and Health Sciences (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

VBAC
technology
pregnancy
information
decision-making
midwifery
systematic review
evidence-based midwifery

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy