SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

WFRF:(Sørensen Ø)
 

Search: WFRF:(Sørensen Ø) > The effect of fast ...

The effect of fast and slow decisions on risk taking

Kirchler, Michael, 1977 (author)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för nationalekonomi med statistik,Centrum för finans,Department of Economics,Centre for Finance,University of Innsbruck (AT),University of Innsbruck, Austria; University of Gothenburg, Sweden
Andersson, David (author)
Linköpings universitet,Nationalekonomi,Filosofiska fakulteten
Bonn, C. (author)
University of Innsbruck (AT),University of Innsbruck, Austria
show more...
Johannesson, Magnus (author)
Linköpings universitet,Stockholm School of Economics,Handelshögskolan i Stockholm,Nationalekonomi,Filosofiska fakulteten,Stockholm School Econ, Sweden
Sorensen, E. O. (author)
NHH Norwegian School Econ, Norway
Stefan, M. (author)
University of Innsbruck (AT),University of Innsbruck, Austria
Tinghög, Gustav (author)
Linköpings universitet,Nationalekonomi,Filosofiska fakulteten
Västfjäll, Daniel (author)
Linköpings universitet,Psykologi,Filosofiska fakulteten,Decis Research, OR 97401 USA
Sørensen, Erik Ø. (author)
Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NO)
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2017-06-07
2017
English.
In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0895-5646 .- 1573-0476. ; 54:1, s. 37-59
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • We experimentally compare fast and slow decisions in a series of experiments on financial risk taking in three countries involving over 1700 subjects. To manipulate fast and slow decisions, subjects were randomly allocated to responding within 7 seconds (time pressure) or waiting for at least 7 or 20 seconds (time delay) before responding. To control for different effects of time pressure and time delay on measurement noise, we estimate separate parameters for noise and risk preferences within a random utility framework. We find that time pressure increases risk aversion for gains and risk taking for losses compared to time delay, implying that time pressure increases the reflection effect of Prospect Theory. The results for gains are weaker and less robust than the results for losses. We find no significant difference between time pressure and time delay for loss aversion (tested in only one of the experiments). Time delay also leads to less measurement noise than time pressure and unconstrained decisions, and appears to be an effective way of decreasing noise in experiments.

Subject headings

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Ekonomi och näringsliv (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Economics and Business (hsv//eng)
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Ekonomi och näringsliv -- Nationalekonomi (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Economics and Business -- Economics (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Prospect Theory
Experimental economics
Time pressure
Measurement noise
Prospect Theory; Experimental economics; Time pressure; Measurement noise

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view