SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Greiff L)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Greiff L) > Treatment outcome i...

Treatment outcome in orthognathic surgery-A prospective randomized blinded case-controlled comparison of planning accuracy in computer-assisted two- and three-dimensional planning techniques (part II)

Bengtsson, Martin (författare)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för odontologi,Institute of Odontology
Wall, G. (författare)
Greiff, L. (författare)
visa fler...
Rasmusson, Lars, 1962 (författare)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för odontologi,Institute of Odontology
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Elsevier BV, 2017
2017
Engelska.
Ingår i: Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. - : Elsevier BV. - 1010-5182. ; 45:9, s. 1419-1424
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Purpose: The aim of the present study was to compare the accuracy of two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) prediction methods. The hypothesis was that a 3D technique would give a more accurate outcome of the postoperative result. Material and methods: Patients with severe class III occlusion were included and planed with both a 2D and 3D prediction technique. They were there after randomly subdivided into a control (2D) and test (3D) group and treated according to the technique randomized for. Cephalometric measurements from 2D and 3D predictions were compared with 12-month follow-up respectively. Together with an analysis of tracing error, placements of 3580 cephalometric markers, 2460 measurements, 680 intra-individual analyses and 1200 preop/postop comparisons were performed in 57 individuals. Results: Statistically significant differences for accuracy between the two groups were seen for 11/NSL112/NSL2 and for A-A2 (p < 0.05). Both groups showed a high level of accuracy for SNA and SNB. The test group also showed a relatively high level of accuracy for 11/NSL and for the A-point. No prediction method achieves a perfect accuracy. As expected from this, measuring accuracy within each group showed statistically significant difference for all markers and cephalometric measurements (p < 0.001). Mandibular markers showed greater differences than maxillary markers. Conclusion: The present study indicates an equal high accuracy in predicting facial outcome for both studied techniques. However, in patients with asymmetry the three-dimensional technique has an obvious advantage. (C) 2017 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Kirurgi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Surgery (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Orthognathic surgery
Dentofacial deformity
Computer-aided surgical simulation
Virtual surgical planning
Cephalometry
Randomized controlled trial
cad/cam surgical splints
distraction osteogenesis
simulation
prediction
maxillary
soft
Dentistry
Oral Surgery & Medicine
Surgery

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Hitta mer i SwePub

Av författaren/redakt...
Bengtsson, Marti ...
Wall, G.
Greiff, L.
Rasmusson, Lars, ...
Om ämnet
MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP
MEDICIN OCH HÄLS ...
och Klinisk medicin
och Kirurgi
Artiklar i publikationen
Journal of Crani ...
Av lärosätet
Göteborgs universitet

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy