SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

id:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/280692"
 

Search: id:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/280692" > Exploitation and jo...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist
  • Malmqvist, ErikLinköping University,Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för filosofi, lingvistik och vetenskapsteori,Department of Philosophy, Linguistics and Theory of Science,Univ Gothenburg, Sweden (author)

Exploitation and joint action

  • Article/chapterEnglish2019

Publisher, publication year, extent ...

  • 2019-03-18
  • Wiley,2019

Numbers

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/280692
  • https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/280692URI
  • https://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12272DOI
  • https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/ad18b7db-e37d-4723-8191-c3e7be791b3fURI
  • https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-161184URI

Supplementary language notes

  • Language:English

Part of subdatabase

Classification

  • Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype
  • Subject category:art swepub-publicationtype

Notes

  • There is a growing philosophical interest in the concept of exploitation as well as in putatively exploitative real-world practices. However, exploitation theory remains underdeveloped in an important way. Philosophers have mainly focused on cases where one party to a transaction or relationship, A, unduly takes advantage of another party, B, in order to secure a gain for him-/herself. At the same time, they have largely ignored cases where A takes advantage of B, but the gains A extracts from B accrue not (only) to A but (also) to a third party, C. The aim of this paper is to fill this gap. We distinguish between three different ways in which third parties can be involved in exploitative arrangements: (i) by non-culpably benefiting from exploitation; (ii) by culpably benefiting, without joint action; and (iii) culpably, through joint action with the exploiter. Drawing on joint action theory, we explore the relevance of this threefold distinction for the attribution of moral responsibility and blame to third parties, and defend it against potential objections. Then we argue that the distinction has important implications for the remedial duties of third-party beneficiaries of exploitation towards those who were exploited. We end by briefly highlighting the usefulness of our approach for ethical analyses of exploitative practices in the real world.

Subject headings and genre

Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)

  • Szigeti, Andras,1974Linköpings universitet,Lund University,Lunds universitet,Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för filosofi, lingvistik och vetenskapsteori,Department of Philosophy, Linguistics and Theory of Science,Praktisk filosofi,Filosofiska institutionen,Institutioner,Humanistiska och teologiska fakulteterna,Practical Philosophy,Departments,Joint Faculties of Humanities and Theology,Avdelningen för kultur och estetik,Filosofiska fakulteten,Lund Gothenburg Responsibil Project, Sweden(Swepub:liu)andsz32 (author)
  • Göteborgs universitetInstitutionen för filosofi, lingvistik och vetenskapsteori (creator_code:org_t)

Related titles

  • In:Journal of social philosophy: Wiley50:3, s. 280-3000047-27861467-9833

Internet link

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view