SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

WFRF:(Olsrud Johan)
 

Search: WFRF:(Olsrud Johan) > MR-safety: Evaluati...

  • Hansson, BoelLund University,Lunds universitet,Diagnostisk radiologi, Lund,Sektion V,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Lund,Medicinska fakulteten,MR Physics,Forskargrupper vid Lunds universitet,LUCC: Lunds universitets cancercentrum,Övriga starka forskningsmiljöer,Diagnostic Radiology, (Lund),Section V,Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund,Faculty of Medicine,Lund University Research Groups,LUCC: Lund University Cancer Centre,Other Strong Research Environments,Skåne University Hospital (author)

MR-safety: Evaluation of compliance with screening routines using a structured screening interview

  • Article/chapterEnglish2022

Publisher, publication year, extent ...

  • 2022-02-01
  • SAGE Publications,2022

Numbers

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/316380
  • https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/316380URI
  • https://doi.org/10.1177/25160435221077493DOI
  • https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/f3a27734-6c9d-4a77-b007-ec970249030bURI

Supplementary language notes

  • Language:English

Part of subdatabase

Classification

  • Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype
  • Subject category:art swepub-publicationtype

Notes

  • Background Magnetic resonance (MR) safety procedures are designed to allow patients, research subjects and personnel to enter the MR-scanner room under controlled conditions and without the risk to be harmed during the examination. Ferromagnetic objects in the MR-environment or inside the human body represent the main safety risks potentially leading to human injuries. Screening for MR-safety risks with dedicated procedures is therefore mandatory. As human errors during the screening procedure might align and lead to an incident compliance is essential. Purpose To evaluate compliance with a documented structured MR-safety screening process. Method Written and signed MR-safety screening documentation collected at a national 7T MR facility during a four-year period was evaluated for compliance of trained personnel with multi-step MR-safety routines. We analysed whether examinations were performed or why they were not performed. Data analysis further included descriptive statistics of the study population (age, gender and patient or healthy volunteer status), identification of missing documents and omitted or incorrect answers, and whether these compliance shortcomings concerned predominantly administrative or MR-safety related issues. Results Documentation of the screening process in 1819 subjects was incomplete in 19% of subjects. The most common documentation shortcoming was omitted fields. Out of 478 omitted answer-fields in 307 subjects, 36% were of administrative nature and 64% related directly to MR-safety issues. Conclusion Compliance with MR-safety screening procedures cannot be taken for granted and deficiencies to comply with screening routines were revealed. Documentation shortcomings concerned both administrative and MR-safety related issues.

Subject headings and genre

Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)

  • Simic, M.Karolinska University Hospital (author)
  • Olsrud, JohanLund University,Lunds universitet,Medicinsk strålningsfysik, Malmö,Forskargrupper vid Lunds universitet,MR Physics,Medical Radiation Physics, Malmö,Lund University Research Groups(Swepub:lu)drad-jol (author)
  • Markenroth Bloch, KarinLund University,Lunds universitet,Lund University Bioimaging Center,Medicinska fakulteten,MR Physics,Forskargrupper vid Lunds universitet,Faculty of Medicine,Lund University Research Groups(Swepub:lu)klin-km0 (author)
  • Owman, TittiLund University,Lunds universitet,Diagnostisk radiologi, Lund,Sektion V,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Lund,Medicinska fakulteten,MR Physics,Forskargrupper vid Lunds universitet,LUCC: Lunds universitets cancercentrum,Övriga starka forskningsmiljöer,Diagnostic Radiology, (Lund),Section V,Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund,Faculty of Medicine,Lund University Research Groups,LUCC: Lund University Cancer Centre,Other Strong Research Environments,Skåne University Hospital(Swepub:lu)drad-tow (author)
  • Sundgren, Pia C.Lund University,Lunds universitet,Diagnostisk radiologi, Lund,Sektion V,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Lund,Medicinska fakulteten,Lund University Bioimaging Center,Neuroradiologi,Forskargrupper vid Lunds universitet,LUCC: Lunds universitets cancercentrum,Övriga starka forskningsmiljöer,Diagnostic Radiology, (Lund),Section V,Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund,Faculty of Medicine,Neuroradiology,Lund University Research Groups,LUCC: Lund University Cancer Centre,Other Strong Research Environments,Karolinska University Hospital,Skåne University Hospital(Swepub:lu)med-psu (author)
  • Björkman-Burtscher, IsabellaGothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Avdelningen för radiologi,Institute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Radiology,Sahlgrenska University Hospital(Swepub:lu)drad-ibu (author)
  • Diagnostisk radiologi, LundSektion V (creator_code:org_t)

Related titles

  • In:Journal of Patient Safety and Risk Management: SAGE Publications27:2, s. 76-822516-04352516-0443

Internet link

Find in a library

To the university's database

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view