CRESTAL VERSUS LATERAL SINUS LIFT: ONE-YEAR RESULTS FROM A WITHIN- PATIENT RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL OPEN

↓ Direkt till sidans innehåll
↓ Direkt till sidans sekundära innehåll (sidomenyn)

Search: WFRF:(Tallarico Marco) > CRESTAL VERSUS LATE...

10 of 10
Previous record
Next record
To hitlist

Details
MARC

Xhanari, E. (author)

CRESTAL VERSUS LATERAL SINUS LIFT: ONE-YEAR RESULTS FROM A WITHIN- PATIENT RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL OPEN

Article/chapterEnglish2019

Publisher, publication year, extent ...

2019

Numbers

LIBRIS-ID:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/299554
https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/299554URI
https://doi.org/10.36130/CTD.01.2019.06DOI

Supplementary language notes

Language:English

Part of subdatabase

SwePubSwePub

Classification

Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype
Subject category:art swepub-publicationtype

Notes

PURPOSE. To compare the effectiveness of and patient preference for crestal versus la- teral sinus lift. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Fifteen partially edentulous patients missing bilateral maxillary molars and/or premolars and having 2 to 6 mm of residual crestal height below the maxillary sinuses were randomised to receive one to three implants placed in sinuses crestally or laterally lifted with bone substitutes according to a split-mouth design. Implants were submerged and loaded after 6 months with definitive screw-retained metal-ceramic prostheses, and patients were followed-up to 1 year after loading. RESULTS. Twenty crestal implants were placed versus 23 lateral ones. One patient drop- ped out and one lateral implant failed (n = 14; difference = 0.07, 95% CI from -0.28 to 0.13; P = 0.99). No prosthesis failed. Three patients were affected by three complications at crestal versus three patients by four complications at lateral sites. The difference was not statistically significant (n = 14; Diff = 0.07; 95% CI -0.24 to 0.38; P-value = 0.99). Statistically significantly less time was required to place crestal implants (28.2 versus 62.2 minutes on average; Diff = 33.4; SD = 12.1; 95% CI -40.4 to 26.4; P = 0.001). Eight patients preferred the crestal procedure and six had no preference. Crestal implants lost 0.99 mm (SD = 0.55) of peri-implant bone height versus 1.02 mm (SD = 0.57) for lateral ones, the difference being not statistically significant (0.03 mm; 95% CI of difference -0.52 to 0.59; P = 0.89) CONCLUSIONS. Both techniques produced successful outcomes, but the crestal technique required less surgical time and was preferred by patients.

Subject headings and genre

Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)

Tallarico, M. (author)
Meloni, S.M. (author)
Kalemaj, Z. (author)
Ceruso, F.M. (author)
Dedaj, E. (author)
Esposito, Marco,1965Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Avdelningen för biomaterialvetenskap,Institute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Biomaterials(Swepub:gu)xespom (author)
Göteborgs universitetInstitutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Avdelningen för biomaterialvetenskap (creator_code:org_t)

Related titles

In:Clinical Trials in Dentistry2019:1, s. 67-78

Internet link

Find in a library

Clinical Trials in Dentistry (Search for host publication in LIBRIS)

To the university's database

10 of 10
Previous record
Next record
To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor: Xhanari, E.; Tallarico, M.; Meloni, S.M.; Kalemaj, Z.; Ceruso, F.M.; Dedaj, E.; show more...; Esposito, Marco, ...; show less...

About the subject

MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES: MEDICAL AND HEAL ...; and Medical Biotechn ...; and Biomaterials Sci ...

Articles in the publication: Clinical Trials ...

By the university: University of Gothenburg

Search outside SwePub

Extend your search to:: Google; Google Book Search; Google Scholar

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

LIBRIS.kb.se