SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Sabel M. S.)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Sabel M. S.) > (2020-2024) > Non-invasive electr...

Non-invasive electrical brain stimulation for vision restoration after stroke: An exploratory randomized trial (REVIS)

Raty, S. (författare)
Borrmann, C. (författare)
Granata, G. (författare)
visa fler...
Cardenas-Morales, L. (författare)
Schoenfeld, A. (författare)
Sailer, M. (författare)
Silvennoinen, K. (författare)
Holopainen, J. (författare)
De Rossi, F. (författare)
Antal, A. (författare)
Rossini, P. M. (författare)
Tatlisumak, Turgut (författare)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för neurovetenskap och fysiologi, sektionen för klinisk neurovetenskap,Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience
Sabel, B. A. (författare)
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
IOS Press, 2021
2021
Engelska.
Ingår i: Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience. - : IOS Press. - 0922-6028 .- 1878-3627. ; 39:3, s. 221-235
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Background: Occipital strokes often cause permanent homonymous hemianopia leading to significant disability. In previous studies, non-invasive electrical brain stimulation (NIBS) has improved vision after optic nerve damage and in combination with training after stroke. Objective: We explored different NIBS modalities for rehabilitation of hemianopia after chronic stroke. Methods: In a randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled, three-armed trial, altogether 56 patients with homonymous hemianopia were recruited. The three experiments were: i) repetitive transorbital alternating current stimulation (rtACS, n=8) vs. rtACS with prior cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the intact visual cortex (tDCS/rtACS, n=8) vs. sham (n = 8); ii) rtACS (n = 9) vs. sham (n = 9); and iii) tDCS of the visual cortex (n = 7) vs. sham (n = 7). Visual functions were evaluated before and after the intervention, and after eight weeks follow-up. The primary outcome was change in visual field assessed by high-resolution and standard perimetries. The individual modalities were compared within each experimental arm. Results: Primary outcomes in Experiments 1 and 2 were negative. Only significant between-group change was observed in Experiment 3, where tDCS increased visual field of the contralesional eye compared to sham. tDCS/rtACS improved dynamic vision, reading, and visual field of the contralesional eye, but was not superior to other groups. rtACS alone increased foveal sensitivity, but was otherwise ineffective. All trial-related procedures were tolerated well. Conclusions: This exploratory trial showed safety but no main effect of NIBS on vision restoration after stroke. However, tDCS and combined tDCS/rtACS induced improvements in visually guided performance that need to be confirmed in larger-sample trials.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Medicinska och farmaceutiska grundvetenskaper -- Neurovetenskaper (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Basic Medicine -- Neurosciences (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Electrical stimulation
homonymous hemianopia
randomized controlled
trial
rehabilitation
occipital stroke
vision restoration
alternating-current stimulation
visual function
hemianopia
recovery
field
sensitivity
plasticity
Neurosciences & Neurology

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy