Sökning: WFRF:(Olsson Leif Jöran 1971)
> (2020-2024) >
Codifying the Debat...
Codifying the Debates of the Riksdag: Towards a Framework for Semi-automatic Annotation of Swedish Parliamentary Discourse
-
- Fridlund, Mats, 1965 (författare)
- Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Centrum för Digital Humaniora (CDH),Institutionen för litteratur, idéhistoria och religion,Centre for Digital Humanities,Department of Literature, History of Ideas, and Religion
-
- Brodén, Daniel, 1975 (författare)
- Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Centrum för Digital Humaniora (CDH),Institutionen för litteratur, idéhistoria och religion,Centre for Digital Humanities,Department of Literature, History of Ideas, and Religion
-
- Olsson, Leif-Jöran, 1971 (författare)
- Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för svenska, flerspråkighet och språkteknologi,Department of Swedish, Multilingualism, Language Technology
-
visa fler...
-
- Ängsal, Magnus Pettersson, 1980 (författare)
- Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för språk och litteraturer,Department of Languages and Literatures
-
visa färre...
-
(creator_code:org_t)
- Aachen : CEUR-WS, 2022
- 2022
- Engelska.
-
Ingår i: CEUR Workshop Proceedings. Matti La Mela, Fredrik Norén & Eero Hyvönen, eds., Proceedings of Digital Parliamentary Data in Action (DiPaDa 2022). Workshop Co-located with the 6th Digital Humanities in the Nordic and Baltic Countries Conference (DHNB 2022), Uppsala, Sweden, March 15, 2022.. - Aachen : CEUR-WS. - 1613-0073.
- Relaterad länk:
-
https://gup.ub.gu.se...
Abstract
Ämnesord
Stäng
- This study provides an exploratory attempt to develop a framework for how to semi-automatically annotate salient topics in Swedish parliamentary debate. The discussion is grounded in the ongoing digital humanities project SweTerror that studies the terrorism discourse in the Riksdag 1968–2018 through a mixed-methods approach. The paper presents our tentative framework through its three main categories: metadata, language data and frame data. While the first two categories are mostly generic and their data could mainly be automatically extracted, the third category is contextual and requires manual interpretation. We discuss the design of the latter through the theoretical concept of ‘framing’ and illustrate the framework’s overall principles through a case study of utterances in the debates 1968–1970 concerning terrorism. We conclude by suggesting that it may be more generally applicable for studies of parliamentary debates in HSS research if further modified for the particular research purposes.
Ämnesord
- HUMANIORA -- Annan humaniora -- Övrig annan humaniora (hsv//swe)
- HUMANITIES -- Other Humanities -- Other Humanities not elsewhere specified (hsv//eng)
- HUMANIORA -- Språk och litteratur -- Jämförande språkvetenskap och allmän lingvistik (hsv//swe)
- HUMANITIES -- Languages and Literature -- General Language Studies and Linguistics (hsv//eng)
- HUMANIORA -- Filosofi, etik och religion -- Idé- och lärdomshistoria (hsv//swe)
- HUMANITIES -- Philosophy, Ethics and Religion -- History of Ideas (hsv//eng)
- NATURVETENSKAP -- Data- och informationsvetenskap -- Språkteknologi (hsv//swe)
- NATURAL SCIENCES -- Computer and Information Sciences -- Language Technology (hsv//eng)
Nyckelord
- terrorism studies
- language technology
- parliamentary data
- parliamentary debate
Publikations- och innehållstyp
- ref (ämneskategori)
- kon (ämneskategori)
Hitta via bibliotek
Till lärosätets databas