SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

hsv:(HUMANIORA) hsv:(Filosofi etik och religion) hsv:(Etik)
 

Sökning: hsv:(HUMANIORA) hsv:(Filosofi etik och religion) hsv:(Etik) > Moral Disagreement ...

Moral Disagreement and Practical Direction

Francén, Ragnar, 1977 (författare)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för filosofi, lingvistik och vetenskapsteori,Department of Philosophy, Linguistics and Theory of Science
 (creator_code:org_t)
2022-11-28
2022
Engelska.
Ingår i: Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy. - : Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy. - 1559-3061. ; 23:2, s. 273-303
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Whenever A judges that x-ing is morally wrong and B judges that x-ing is not morally wrong, we think that they disagree. The two standard types of accounts of such moral disagreements both presuppose that the class of moral wrong-judgments is uniform, though in different ways. According to the belief account, the disagreement is doxastic: A and B have beliefs with conflicting cognitive contents. This presupposes “belief-uniformity”: that the content of moral concepts is invariant in such a way that, whenever A believes that x-ing is morally wrong and B believes that x-ing is not morally wrong, their beliefs have mutually inconsistent contents. According to the attitude account, moral disagreements are non-doxastic: A and B have clashing practical attitudes. This presupposes “attitude-uniformity”: that moral judgments are always accompanied by, or consist of, desire-like attitudes. Consequently, neither account is available if both uniformity-claims are rejected – as e.g., various forms of content-relativism do. This paper presents a new non-doxastic account of deontic moral disagreement, consistent with the rejection of both uniformity-claims. I argue first, that even if deontic moral judgments are not desires, and are not always accompanied by desires, they have practical direction in the same sense as desires: they are attitudes that one can act in accordance or discordance with. Second: deontic moral disagreement can be understood as clashes in practical direction: roughly, A and B morally disagree if, and only if, some way of acting is in accordance with A’s judgment but in discordance with B’s.

Ämnesord

HUMANIORA  -- Filosofi, etik och religion -- Filosofi (hsv//swe)
HUMANITIES  -- Philosophy, Ethics and Religion -- Philosophy (hsv//eng)
HUMANIORA  -- Filosofi, etik och religion (hsv//swe)
HUMANITIES  -- Philosophy, Ethics and Religion (hsv//eng)
HUMANIORA  -- Filosofi, etik och religion -- Etik (hsv//swe)
HUMANITIES  -- Philosophy, Ethics and Religion -- Ethics (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Moral disagreement
Moral relativism
Moral contextualism

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Hitta mer i SwePub

Av författaren/redakt...
Francén, Ragnar, ...
Om ämnet
HUMANIORA
HUMANIORA
och Filosofi etik oc ...
och Filosofi
HUMANIORA
HUMANIORA
och Filosofi etik oc ...
HUMANIORA
HUMANIORA
och Filosofi etik oc ...
och Etik
Artiklar i publikationen
Journal of Ethic ...
Av lärosätet
Göteborgs universitet

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy