SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

WFRF:(Dickens L.)
 

Search: WFRF:(Dickens L.) > (2020-2023) > Revision Arthroscop...

  • Slaven, Sean E. (author)

Revision Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Results in High Failure Rates and a Low Return to Duty Rate Without Recurrent Instability

  • Article/chapterEnglish2023

Publisher, publication year, extent ...

  • Elsevier BV,2023

Numbers

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/335575
  • https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/335575URI
  • https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2022.08.044DOI

Supplementary language notes

  • Language:English

Part of subdatabase

Classification

  • Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype
  • Subject category:art swepub-publicationtype

Notes

  • Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine, in a military population without critical bone loss, the rate of recurrent instability after revision arthroscopic stabilization for failed primary arthroscopic Bankart repair. Methods: Fortyone revision arthroscopic stabilizations were performed at a single military institution between 2005 to 2016 for recurrent anterior shoulder instability after primary arthroscopic Bankart repair. Minimum follow-up was 2 years, and shoulders with glenoid bone loss >20% were excluded. The primary outcome of interest was the incidence of failure, defined by recurrent instability. Results: Age at revision surgery averaged 22.9 +/- 4.3 years, and 88% were either service academy cadets or active duty combat arms soldiers. Mean follow-up was 7.8 years. Twenty-three patients (56%) returned to duty without recurrent instability after revision arthroscopic stabilization. Eighteen patients (44%) experienced recurrent instability after return to duty. Glenoid bone loss averaged 6.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.2%-9.2%) in the successful group and 5.7% (95% CI, 3.1%-8.3%) in the failure group (P = .808). Conclusions: Revision arthroscopic stabilization of failed primary arthroscopic Bankart repair has a failure rate of 44% in a young military population. The similar amounts of bone loss between groups indicates that bone loss is not the primary determinant of failure in revision arthroscopic stabilization.

Subject headings and genre

Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)

  • Donohue, Michael A. (author)
  • Tardif, Robert A. (author)
  • Foley, Kevin A. (author)
  • Leclere, Lance E. (author)
  • Cameron, Kenneth L. (author)
  • Giuliani, Jeffrey R. (author)
  • Posner, Matthew A. (author)
  • Dickens, JonathanGothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Avdelningen för ortopedi,Institute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Orthopaedics(Swepub:gu)xdicjo (author)
  • Göteborgs universitetInstitutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Avdelningen för ortopedi (creator_code:org_t)

Related titles

  • In:ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY: Elsevier BV39:4, s. 913-9180749-80631526-3231

Internet link

Find in a library

To the university's database

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view