Search: onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/58947" >
Evaluating the reli...
-
Bunketorp, Lina,1975Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för arbetsterapi och fysioterapi,Institute of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy
(author)
Evaluating the reliability of multi-item scales: a non-parametric approach to the ordered categorical structure of data collected with the Swedish version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia and the Self-Efficacy Scale.
- Article/chapterEnglish2005
Publisher, publication year, extent ...
-
Medical Journals Sweden AB,2005
Numbers
-
LIBRIS-ID:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/58947
-
https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/58947URI
-
https://doi.org/10.1080/16501970510036411DOI
-
http://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:1950852URI
Supplementary language notes
Part of subdatabase
Classification
-
Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype
-
Subject category:art swepub-publicationtype
Notes
-
OBJECTIVE: To compare the ability of a rank-invariant non-parametric method with that of kappa statistics to evaluate the reliability of the Swedish version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia and the Self-Efficacy Scale by identifying systematic and random disagreement. The aim was, further, to compare 2 different statistical approaches to obtain a global value from multi-item scales. DESIGN: A test-retest study. SUBJECTS: A total of 46 patients with whiplash-associated disorders were enrolled and 39 (85%) completed the test-retest assessment. METHODS: Data from the multi-item scales were summarized using both sum and median scores. Paired data were evaluated with a rank-invariant statistical method to identify systematic and random disagreement. Data were also evaluated with kappa statistics. RESULTS: The non-parametric approach demonstrated that the Swedish version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia and the Self-Efficacy Scale are reliable for patients with whiplash-associated disorders. In contrast to the rank-invariant method, kappa statistics provided no information on disagreement between the 2 test occasions. Median scoring improved reliability due to lack of disagreement while the sum scores method was characterized by random individual disagreement. CONCLUSION: This study has increased understanding of the advantages and limitations of 2 non-parametric statistical methods and, it is hoped, will contribute to the development of reliable measurements.
Subject headings and genre
Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)
-
Carlsson, Jane,1946Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för arbetsterapi och fysioterapi,Institute of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy(Swepub:gu)xcarja
(author)
-
Kowalski, Jan
(author)
-
Stener-Victorin, Elisabet,1964Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för arbetsterapi och fysioterapi,Institute of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy(Swepub:gu)xsteel
(author)
-
Göteborgs universitetInstitutionen för arbetsterapi och fysioterapi
(creator_code:org_t)
Related titles
-
In:Journal of rehabilitation medicine : official journal of the UEMS European Board of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine: Medical Journals Sweden AB37:5, s. 330-41650-1977
Internet link
Find in a library
To the university's database