Search: (WFRF:(Drummond C.)) srt2:(2010-2014) >
Analyzing overall s...
Analyzing overall survival in randomized controlled trials with crossover and implications for economic evaluation
-
- Jönsson, L (author)
- Karolinska Institutet,OptumInsight AB
-
- Sandin, Rickard (author)
- Global Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Pfizer Oncology,Global Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Pfizer Oncology
-
- Ramsberg, Joakim (author)
- OptumInsight AB
-
show more...
-
- Weinstein, M.C. (author)
- Harvard School of Public Health,Global Outcomes Research, Specialty Care BU
-
- Drummond, M. (author)
- University of York (GB)
-
- Charbonneau, C. (author)
- Global Outcomes Research, Specialty Care BU
-
- Huang, X. (author)
- Oncology Clinical Development
-
- Ekman, Mattias (author)
- OptumInsight AB
-
- Jönsson, Bengt (author)
- Stockholm School of Economics,Handelshögskolan i Stockholm
-
show less...
-
(creator_code:org_t)
- Wiley: No OnlineOpen / Elsevier, 2014
- 2014
- English.
-
In: Value in Health. - : Wiley: No OnlineOpen / Elsevier. - 1098-3015. ; 17:6, s. 707-713
- Related links:
-
http://www.valueinhe...
-
show more...
-
https://research.hhs...
-
https://doi.org/10.1...
-
http://kipublication...
-
show less...
Abstract
Subject headings
Close
- Background: Offering patients in oncology trials the opportunity to cross over to active treatment at disease progression is a common strategy to address ethical issues associated with placebo controls but may lead to statistical challenges in the analysis of overall survival and cost-effectiveness because crossover leads to information loss and dilution of comparative clinical efficacy. Objectives: We provide an overview of how to address crossover, implications for risk-effect estimates of survival (hazard ratios) and cost-effectiveness, and how this influences decisions of reimbursement agencies. Two case studies using data from two phase III sunitinib oncology trials are used as illustration. Methods: We reviewed the literature on statistical methods for adjusting for crossover and recent health technology assessment decisions in oncology. Results: We show that for a trial with a high proportion of crossover from the control arm to the investigational arm, the choice of the statistical method greatly affects treatment-effect estimates and cost-effectiveness because the range of relative mortality risk for active treatment versus control is broad. With relatively frequent crossover, one should consider either the inverse probability of censoring weighting or the rank-preserving structural failure time model to minimize potential bias, with choice dependent on crossover characteristics, trial size, and available data. A large proportion of crossover favors the rank-preserving structural failure time model, while large sample size and abundant information about confounding factors favors the inverse probability of censoring weighting model. When crossover is very infrequent, methods yield similar results. Conclusions: Failure to correct for crossover may lead to suboptimal decisions by pricing and reimbursement authorities, thereby limiting an effective drug's potential.
Subject headings
- NATURVETENSKAP -- Matematik -- Sannolikhetsteori och statistik (hsv//swe)
- NATURAL SCIENCES -- Mathematics -- Probability Theory and Statistics (hsv//eng)
Publication and Content Type
- art (subject category)
- ref (subject category)
Find in a library
To the university's database