Sökning: L773:1755 3768 OR L773:1755 375X >
Machine learning cl...
Machine learning classifiers for glaucoma diagnosis based on classification of retinal nerve fibre layer thickness parameters measured by Stratus OCT.
-
- Bizios, Dimitrios (författare)
- Lund University,Lunds universitet,Oftalmologi (Malmö),Forskargrupper vid Lunds universitet,Ophthalmology (Malmö),Lund University Research Groups
-
- Heijl, Anders (författare)
- Lund University,Lunds universitet,Oftalmologi (Malmö),Forskargrupper vid Lunds universitet,Ophthalmology (Malmö),Lund University Research Groups
-
- Hougaard, Jesper (författare)
- Lund University,Lunds universitet,Oftalmologi (Malmö),Forskargrupper vid Lunds universitet,Ophthalmology (Malmö),Lund University Research Groups
-
visa fler...
-
- Bengtsson, Boel (författare)
- Lund University,Lunds universitet,Oftalmologi (Malmö),Forskargrupper vid Lunds universitet,Ophthalmology (Malmö),Lund University Research Groups
-
visa färre...
-
(creator_code:org_t)
- Wiley, 2010
- 2010
- Engelska.
-
Ingår i: Acta Ophthalmologica. - : Wiley. - 1755-3768 .- 1755-375X. ; 88, s. 44-52
- Relaterad länk:
-
http://www.ncbi.nlm....
-
visa fler...
-
http://dx.doi.org/10...
-
https://onlinelibrar...
-
https://lup.lub.lu.s...
-
https://doi.org/10.1...
-
visa färre...
Abstract
Ämnesord
Stäng
- Abstract. Purpose: To compare the performance of two machine learning classifiers (MLCs), artificial neural networks (ANNs) and support vector machines (SVMs), with input based on retinal nerve fibre layer thickness (RNFLT) measurements by optical coherence tomography (OCT), on the diagnosis of glaucoma, and to assess the effects of different input parameters. Methods: We analysed Stratus OCT data from 90 healthy persons and 62 glaucoma patients. Performance of MLCs was compared using conventional OCT RNFLT parameters plus novel parameters such as minimum RNFLT values, 10th and 90th percentiles of measured RNFLT, and transformations of A-scan measurements. For each input parameter and MLC, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AROC) was calculated. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between ANNs and SVMs. The best AROCs for both ANN (0.982, 95%CI: 0.966-0.999) and SVM (0.989, 95% CI: 0.979-1.0) were based on input of transformed A-scan measurements. Our SVM trained on this input performed better than ANNs or SVMs trained on any of the single RNFLT parameters (p
Ämnesord
- MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP -- Klinisk medicin -- Oftalmologi (hsv//swe)
- MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES -- Clinical Medicine -- Ophthalmology (hsv//eng)
Publikations- och innehållstyp
- art (ämneskategori)
- ref (ämneskategori)
Hitta via bibliotek
Till lärosätets databas