Search: id:"swepub:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:269cb4d9-1d9f-4921-966e-92ee14876866" >
Knowledge of evolut...
-
Löfgren, LarsLund University,Lunds universitet,Institutionen för elektro- och informationsteknik,Institutioner vid LTH,Lunds Tekniska Högskola,Department of Electrical and Information Technology,Departments at LTH,Faculty of Engineering, LTH
(author)
Knowledge of evolution and evolution of knowledge
- Article/chapterEnglish1981
Publisher, publication year, extent ...
Numbers
-
LIBRIS-ID:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:269cb4d9-1d9f-4921-966e-92ee14876866
-
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/1744446URI
Supplementary language notes
-
Language:English
-
Summary in:English
Part of subdatabase
Classification
-
Subject category:kap swepub-publicationtype
-
Subject category:vet swepub-contenttype
Notes
-
It is argued that evolution goes beyond that which can be described in a well-defined language) and that it instead enforces a language that is itself evolving. Evolution is the unfolding of this self-reference. The unfolding methodology of the logician Alfred Tarski is taken as a basis for the explicability of evolution. Looking at Tarski´s results as a linguistic complementarity, we get a view with the productivity of this complementarity as the srource of evolutionary phenomena. These extend to the biological domain upon recognition of life as an autolinguistic phenomenon. In particular, a describability theory for induction (the epistemological counterpart to biological natural selection) is developed. It explains how induction functions can exist, although not effectively describable. Furthermore, the so called Popper-Carnap controversy is found to have a natural origin in the linguistic complementarity. Another question under philosophical debate, that of self-supporting rules of induction, is analyzed in terms of the describability theory and found to have a positive answer. Finally, a systems approach to evolution of knowledge is outlined, aiming at extensions of fragmented areas of knowledge to uncover cyclic connections, admitting self-consistency as a criterion for acceptability. The method for establishing self-consistency is the basic unfolding, the divergence of which entertains the evolutionary process. Underneath is the productivity of the linguistic complementarity. By comparison such a productivity seems to be lacking in the complementarity conception of Bohr. The systems approach is compared with "bootstrap" philosopby in physics.
Subject headings and genre
Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)
-
Jantsch, Erich
(editor)
-
Institutionen för elektro- och informationsteknikInstitutioner vid LTH
(creator_code:org_t)
Related titles
-
In:The evolutionary vision : toward a unifying paradigm of physical, biological, and sociocultural evolution, s. 129-1510865311404
Internet link
Find in a library
To the university's database