SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

id:"swepub:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:4ac97ba3-0626-4958-9f80-8837eb64efe2"
 

Search: id:"swepub:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:4ac97ba3-0626-4958-9f80-8837eb64efe2" > Factors associated ...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist
  • Harris, JK (author)

Factors associated with the technical performance of colonoscopy: An EPAGE study.

  • Article/chapterEnglish2007

Publisher, publication year, extent ...

  • Elsevier BV,2007

Numbers

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:4ac97ba3-0626-4958-9f80-8837eb64efe2
  • https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/1142035URI
  • https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2007.02.012DOI
  • https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/1542495URI

Supplementary language notes

  • Language:English
  • Summary in:English

Part of subdatabase

Classification

  • Subject category:art swepub-publicationtype
  • Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype

Notes

  • Background Variations in colonoscopy practice exist, which may be related to healthcare quality. Aims To determine factors associated with three performance indicators of colonoscopy: complete colonoscopy, adenomatous polyp diagnosis, and duration. Patients Consecutive patients referred for colonoscopy from 21 centres in 11 countries. Methods This prospective observational study used multiple variable regression analyses to identify determinants of the quality indicators. Results Six thousand and four patients were included in the study. Patients from private, open-access centres (odds ratio: 3.17, 95% confidence interval: 1.87–5.38) were more likely to have a complete colonoscopy than patients from public, gatekeeper centres. Patients from centres where over 50% of the endoscopists were of senior rank were roughly twice as likely to have an adenoma diagnosed, and longer average withdrawal duration (odds ratio: 1.08, 95% confidence interval: 1.07–1.09) was associated with more frequent adenoma diagnoses. Patients who had difficulty during colonoscopy had longer durations to caecum (time ratio: 2.87, 95% confidence interval: 2.72–3.01) and withdrawal durations (time ratio: 1.26, 95% confidence interval: 1.18–1.33) than patients who had no difficulties. Conclusions Multiple factors have been identified as being associated with key quality indicators. The non-modifiable factors permit the identification of patients who may be at greater risk of not having quality colonoscopy, while changes to the modifiable factors may help improve the quality of colonoscopy.

Subject headings and genre

Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)

  • Froehlich, F (author)
  • Wietlisbach, V (author)
  • Burnand, B (author)
  • Gonvers, J-J (author)
  • Vader, J-P (author)
  • Benoni, CeciliaLund University,Lunds universitet,Enheten för kroniska inflammatoriska och degenerativa sjukdomar,Forskargrupper vid Lunds universitet,Chronic Inflammatory and Degenerative Diseases Research Unit,Lund University Research Groups(Swepub:lu)medf-cbe (author)
  • Toth, ErvinLund University,Lunds universitet,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Malmö,Medicinska fakulteten,Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö,Faculty of Medicine(Swepub:lu)ront-eto (author)
  • Enheten för kroniska inflammatoriska och degenerativa sjukdomarForskargrupper vid Lunds universitet (creator_code:org_t)
  • The EPAGE study group

Related titles

  • In:Digestive and Liver Disease: Elsevier BV39:7, s. 678-6891590-8658
  • In:Digestive Endoscopy: Elsevier BV39:7, s. 678-6891443-1661

Internet link

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view