SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

WFRF:(Roberts Lynae)
 

Search: WFRF:(Roberts Lynae) > Test-Retest Reliabi...

Test-Retest Reliability of the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C and the Elkins Hypnotizability Scale

Kekecs, Zoltan (author)
Lund University,Lunds universitet,Institutionen för psykologi,Samhällsvetenskapliga institutioner och centrumbildningar,Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten,Department of Psychology,Departments of Administrative, Economic and Social Sciences,Faculty of Social Sciences,Eötvös Loránd University
Roberts, Lynae (author)
Baylor University
Na, Hyeji (author)
Baylor University
show more...
Yek, Ming Hwei (author)
Baylor University
Slonena, Elizabeth E (author)
Baylor University
Racelis, Ezrhiel (author)
Baylor University
Voor, Tamara A (author)
Baylor University
Johansson, Robert (author)
Lund University
Rizzo, Pietro (author)
Lund University
Csikos, Endre (author)
Eötvös Loránd University
Vizkievicz, Vanda (author)
Eötvös Loránd University
Elkins, Gary (author)
Baylor University
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2021-01-29
2021
English 20 s.
In: International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1744-5183 .- 0020-7144. ; 69:1, s. 142-161
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • This project aimed to assess the consistency of hypnotizability over repeated assessments when measured by the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale: Form C (SHSS:C), and the Elkins Hypnotizability Scale (EHS) and to contrast score distribution and pleasantness of these scales. University students were administered either the SHSS:C or the EHS twice with a one-week delay by separate experimenters. Test-retest reliability of the EHS and the SHSS:C was rs =.82 (.71-.92) and rs =.66, 95% (.47-.86), respectively (Spearman's correlation). Hypnotizability was comparable at test and retest in the EHS group, SHSS:C scores decreased by the retest. We found that the SHSS:C produced higher scores than the EHS, and the pleasantness of the 2 scales was comparable. Overall, our results supported the reliability of the EHS, while SHSS:C scores were more inconsistent between the 2 assessments. More research is warranted.

Subject headings

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Psykologi (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Psychology (hsv//eng)

Publication and Content Type

art (subject category)
ref (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view