SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

WFRF:(Peters R)
 

Search: WFRF:(Peters R) > (2000-2004) > Prevalence and risk...

Prevalence and risk factors for ischemia, leak, and stricture of esophageal anastomosis: Gastric pull-up versus colon interposition

Briel, J W (author)
Tamhankar, A P (author)
Hagen, J A (author)
show more...
DeMeester, S R (author)
Johansson, Jan (author)
Lund University,Lunds universitet,Kirurgi, Lund,Sektion V,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Lund,Medicinska fakulteten,Surgery (Lund),Section V,Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund,Faculty of Medicine
Choustoulakis, E (author)
Peters, J H (author)
Bremner, C G (author)
DeMeester, T R (author)
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2004
2004
English.
In: Journal of the American College of Surgeons. - : Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health). - 1879-1190 .- 1072-7515. ; 198:4, s. 536-541
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • BACKGROUND: Reports of esophageal anastomotic complications often involve more gastric than colonic reconstructions and are incomplete because of fragmented followup by physicians unfamiliar with the surgical procedure. STUDY DESIGN: Three hundred ninety-three consecutive esophagectomy patients had prevalence and risk factors determined for graft ischemia and anastomotic leak; 363 of these patients followed for more than I month (median 15 months) had prevalence and risk factors determined for anastomotic stricture. RESULTS: Conduit ischemia occurred in 36 (9.2%) and anastomotic leak in 43 patients (10.9%). Risk factor for ischemia was comorbid conditions requiring therapy (Odds ratio [OR]: 2.2 [95% CI 1.1-4.3]), and for leak were ischemia (OR: 5.5 [95% CI 2.5-12. 1]), neoadjuvant therapy (OR: 2.2 [95% CI 1.1-4-5]), and comorbid conditions (OR: 2.1 [95% Cl 1.1-3.9]). A stricture developed in 80 patients (22.0%). Risk factors were ischemia (OR: 4.4 [95% Cl 2.0-9.6]), anastomotic leak (OR: 3.8 [95% C11.9-7.6]), and increasing preoperative weight (p = 0.022). The prevalence of ischemia was similar after gastric (10.4%) versus colonic (7.4%) reconstruction; leak and stricture were more common (14.3% versus 6.1%, p = 0.013, 31.3% versus 8.7%, p < 0.000 1, respectively) and strictures were more severe (11.2% versus 2%, p = 0.00 1) after gastric pull-up. Patients free of ischemia and leak who developed stricture were more likely to have had a gastric pull-up (25% versus 7%, p < 0. 000 1). Dilatation was effective treatment in 93% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: After esophagectomy 10% of patients will develop conduit ischemia or an anastomotic leak and 22% will develop anastornotic stricture. Anastomotic leak and strictures are more common and the strictures are more severe after gastric pull-up compared with colon interposition. Dilatation is a safe and effective treatment.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Kirurgi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Surgery (hsv//eng)

Publication and Content Type

art (subject category)
ref (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view