SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

WFRF:(Nepogodiev D)
 

Search: WFRF:(Nepogodiev D) > (2018) > An international mu...

  • Buchwald, PamelaLund University,Lunds universitet,Kirurgi,Forskargrupper vid Lunds universitet,Surgery,Lund University Research Groups (creator_code:cre_t)

An international multicentre prospective audit of elective rectal cancer surgery; operative approach versus outcome, including transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME)

  • Article/chapterEnglish2018

Publisher, publication year, extent ...

  • 2018-09-25
  • Wiley,2018

Numbers

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:76ba0f47-c645-4bc5-8755-b45ee8a48e02
  • https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/76ba0f47-c645-4bc5-8755-b45ee8a48e02URI
  • https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.14376DOI
  • http://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:139264350URI

Supplementary language notes

  • Language:English
  • Summary in:English

Part of subdatabase

Classification

  • Subject category:art swepub-publicationtype
  • Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype

Notes

  • INTRODUCTION: Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) has rapidly emerged as a novel approach for rectal cancer surgery. Safety profiles are still emerging and more comparative data is urgently needed. This study aimed to compare indications and short-term outcomes of TaTME, open, laparoscopic, and robotic TME internationally.METHODS: A pre-planned analysis of the European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) 2017 audit was performed. Patients undergoing elective total mesorectal excision (TME) for malignancy between 1 January 2017 and 15 March 2017 by any operative approach were included. The primary outcome measure was anastomotic leak.RESULTS: Of 2579 included patients, 76.2% (1966/2579) underwent TME with restorative anastomosis of which 19.9% (312/1966) had a minimally invasive approach (laparoscopic or robotic) which included a transanal component (TaTME). Overall, 9.0% (175/1951, 15 missing outcome data) of patients suffered an anastomotic leak. On univariate analysis both laparoscopic TaTME (OR 1.61, 1.02-2.48, P = 0.04) and robotic TaTME (OR 3.05, 1.10-7.34, P = 0.02) were associated with a higher risk of anastomotic leak than non-transanal laparoscopic TME. However this association was lost in the mixed-effects model controlling for patient and disease factors (OR 1.23, 0.77-1.97, P = 0.39 and OR 2.11, 0.79-5.62, P = 0.14 respectively), whilst low rectal anastomosis (OR 2.72, 1.55-4.77, P < 0.001) and male gender (OR 2.29, 1.52-3.44, P < 0.001) remained strongly associated. The overall positive circumferential margin resection rate was 4.0%, which varied between operative approaches: laparoscopic 3.2%, transanal 3.8%, open 4.7%, robotic 1%.CONCLUSION: This contemporaneous international snapshot shows that uptake of the TaTME approach is widespread and is associated with surgically and pathologically acceptable results.

Subject headings and genre

Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)

  • Minaya-Bravo, ABAM (author)
  • Gallo, G (author)
  • Glasbey, JC (author)
  • Kamarajah, S (author)
  • Nepogodiev, D (author)
  • Pinkney, T (author)
  • El-Hussana, A (author)
  • KirurgiForskargrupper vid Lunds universitet (creator_code:org_t)
  • 2017 European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) collaborating group

Related titles

  • In:Colorectal Disease: Wiley2020 Suppl 6, s. 33-461462-8910
  • In:Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland: Wiley2020 Suppl 6, s. 33-461463-1318

Internet link

Find in a library

To the university's database

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view