SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

L773:0360 3016
 

Search: L773:0360 3016 > (2020-2024) > Effect of Conventio...

Effect of Conventional and Ultrahigh Dose Rate FLASH Irradiations on Preclinical Tumor Models : A Systematic Analysis

Böhlen, Till Tobias (author)
Lausanne University Hospital
Germond, Jean François (author)
Lausanne University Hospital
Petersson, Kristoffer (author)
University of Oxford,Skåne University Hospital
show more...
Ozsahin, Esat Mahmut (author)
Lausanne University Hospital
Herrera, Fernanda G. (author)
Lausanne University Hospital
Bailat, Claude (author)
Lausanne University Hospital
Bochud, François (author)
Lausanne University Hospital
Bourhis, Jean (author)
Lausanne University Hospital
Moeckli, Raphaël (author)
Lausanne University Hospital
Adrian, Gabriel (author)
Lund University,Lunds universitet,LUCC: Lunds universitets cancercentrum,Övriga starka forskningsmiljöer,Strålterapi,Sektion I,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Lund,Medicinska fakulteten,LUCC: Lund University Cancer Centre,Other Strong Research Environments,Radiation therapy,Section I,Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund,Faculty of Medicine,Skåne University Hospital
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2023
2023
English.
In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. - 0360-3016. ; 117:4, s. 1007-1017
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Purpose: Compared with conventional dose rate irradiation (CONV), ultrahigh dose rate irradiation (UHDR) has shown superior normal tissue sparing. However, a clinically relevant widening of the therapeutic window by UHDR, termed “FLASH effect”, also depends on the tumor toxicity obtained by UHDR. Based on a combined analysis of published literature, the current study examined the hypothesis of tumor isoefficacy for UHDR versus CONV and aimed to identify potential knowledge gaps to inspire future in vivo studies. Methods and Materials: A systematic literature search identified publications assessing in vivo tumor responses comparing UHDR and CONV. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed, including combined analyses of tumor growth and survival data. Results: We identified 66 data sets from 15 publications that compared UHDR and CONV for tumor efficacy. The median number of animals per group was 9 (range 3-15) and the median follow-up period was 30.5 days (range 11-230) after the first irradiation. Tumor growth assays were the predominant model used. Combined statistical analyses of tumor growth and survival data are consistent with UHDR isoefficacy compared with CONV. Only 1 study determined tumor-controlling dose (TCD50) and reported statistically nonsignificant differences. Conclusions: The combined quantitative analyses of tumor responses support the assumption of UHDR isoefficacy compared with CONV. However, the comparisons are primarily based on heterogeneous tumor growth assays with limited numbers of animals and short follow-up, and most studies do not assess long-term tumor control probability. Therefore, the assays may be insensitive in resolving smaller response differences, such as responses of radioresistant tumor subclones. Hence, tumor cure experiments, including additional TCD50 experiments, are needed to confirm the assumption of isoeffectiveness in curative settings.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Cancer och onkologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Cancer and Oncology (hsv//eng)

Publication and Content Type

art (subject category)
ref (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view