SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

WFRF:(Ramsey Goldman Rosalind)
 

Search: WFRF:(Ramsey Goldman Rosalind) > Comparison of the 2...

  • Petri, MichelleJohns Hopkins University (author)

Comparison of the 2019 European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology/American College of Rheumatology Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Classification Criteria With Two Sets of Earlier Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Classification Criteria

  • Article/chapterEnglish2021

Publisher, publication year, extent ...

  • 2021-07-14
  • Wiley,2021
  • 5 s.

Numbers

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:8282056f-ae3d-4386-948e-c72c70184f78
  • https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/8282056f-ae3d-4386-948e-c72c70184f78URI
  • https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.24263DOI

Supplementary language notes

  • Language:English
  • Summary in:English

Part of subdatabase

Classification

  • Subject category:art swepub-publicationtype
  • Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype

Notes

  • Objective: The Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) 2012 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) classification criteria and the revised American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1997 criteria are list based, counting each SLE manifestation equally. We derived a classification rule based on giving variable weights to the SLICC criteria and compared its performance to the revised ACR 1997, the unweighted SLICC 2012, and the newly reported European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR)/ACR 2019 criteria sets. Methods: The physician-rated patient scenarios used to develop the SLICC 2012 classification criteria were reemployed to devise a new weighted classification rule using multiple linear regression. The performance of the rule was evaluated on an independent set of expert-diagnosed patient scenarios and compared to the performance of the previously reported classification rules. Results: The weighted SLICC criteria and the EULAR/ACR 2019 criteria had less sensitivity but better specificity compared to the list-based revised ACR 1997 and SLICC 2012 classification criteria. There were no statistically significant differences between any pair of rules with respect to overall agreement with the physician diagnosis. Conclusion: The 2 new weighted classification rules did not perform better than the existing list-based rules in terms of overall agreement on a data set originally generated to assess the SLICC criteria. Given the added complexity of summing weights, researchers may prefer the unweighted SLICC criteria. However, the performance of a classification rule will always depend on the populations from which the cases and non-cases are derived and whether the goal is to prioritize sensitivity or specificity.

Subject headings and genre

Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)

  • Goldman, Daniel W.Johns Hopkins University (author)
  • Alarcón, Graciela S.University of Alabama (author)
  • Gordon, CarolineUniversity of Birmingham (author)
  • Merrill, Joan T.Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation (author)
  • Fortin, Paul R.Laval University (author)
  • Bruce, Ian N.Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (author)
  • Isenberg, DavidUniversity College London (author)
  • Wallace, DanielUniversity of California, Los Angeles (author)
  • Nived, OlaLund University,Lunds universitet,Reumatologi och molekylär skelettbiologi,Sektion III,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Lund,Medicinska fakulteten,Rheumatology,Section III,Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund,Faculty of Medicine(Swepub:lu)reum-oni (author)
  • Ramsey-Goldman, RosalindNorthwestern University (author)
  • Bae, Sang Cheol (author)
  • Hanly, John G.Dalhousie University (author)
  • Sanchez-Guerrero, JorgeUniversity of Toronto (author)
  • Clarke, Ann E.University of Calgary (author)
  • Aranow, CynthiaFeinstein Institute for Medical Research (author)
  • Manzi, SusanAllegheny Health Network (author)
  • Urowitz, MurrayUniversity of Toronto (author)
  • Gladman, Dafna D.University of Toronto (author)
  • Kalunian, KenUniversity of California, San Diego (author)
  • Werth, Victoria P.Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (author)
  • Zoma, AsadHairmyres Hospital (author)
  • Bernatsky, SashaMcGill University Health Center (author)
  • Khamashta, Munther (author)
  • Jacobsen, SørenCopenhagen University Hospital (author)
  • Buyon, Jill P.New York University (author)
  • Dooley, Mary AnneUniversity of North Carolina (author)
  • van Vollenhoven, RonaldAcademic Medical Center of University of Amsterdam (AMC) (author)
  • Ginzler, EllenSUNY Downstate Health Sciences University (author)
  • Stoll, ThomasCantonal Hospital of Olten (author)
  • Peschken, ChristineUniversity of Manitoba (author)
  • Jorizzo, Joseph L.Wake Forest University (author)
  • Callen, Jeffery P.University of Louisville (author)
  • Lim, SamEmory University (author)
  • Inanç, MuratIstanbul University (author)
  • Kamen, Diane L.Medical University of South Carolina (author)
  • Rahman, AnisurUniversity College London (author)
  • Steinsson, KristjanNational University Hospital of Iceland (author)
  • Franks, Andrew G.New York University (author)
  • Magder, Laurence S.University of Maryland, Baltimore (author)
  • Johns Hopkins UniversityUniversity of Alabama (creator_code:org_t)

Related titles

  • In:Arthritis Care and Research: Wiley73:9, s. 1231-12352151-464X2151-4658

Internet link

Find in a library

To the university's database

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view