SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Goldman Aaron James)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Goldman Aaron James) > Exceptions (to exce...

Exceptions (to exceptions) and decisions (about decisions) in Kierkegaard’s Fear and Trembling and Schmitt’s Political Theology

Goldman, Aaron James (författare)
Lund University,Lunds universitet,Tros- och livsåskådningsvetenskap,Centrum för teologi och religionsvetenskap,Institutioner,Humanistiska och teologiska fakulteterna,LU profilområde: Mänskliga rättigheter,Lunds universitets profilområden,Studies in Faith and World Views,Centre for Theology and Religious Studies,Departments,Joint Faculties of Humanities and Theology,LU Profile Area: Human rights,Lund University Profile areas
Pöykkö, Panu-Matti (redaktör/utgivare)
Slotte, Pamela (redaktör/utgivare)
visa fler...
Salo, Viljami (redaktör/utgivare)
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Engelska.
Ingår i: Political violence : Historical, philosophical and theological perspectives - Historical, philosophical and theological perspectives. - 9783110999884 - 9783110990645 ; 4
  • Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • This piece investigates a contested intersection between the decisionisms of Carl Schmitt and Søren Kierkegaard. In his Political theology (1922), Schmitt quotes from Kierkegaard’s Repetition (1843) to support his claims about sovereignty, decision, and exception. However, as I argue, it is more likely an implicit (mis)interpretation of Fear and trembling’s (1843) articulation of faith – particularly the book’s infamous idea of a “teleological suspension of the ethical” – that Schmitt wields to advance his account of sovereignty. As Fear and trembling’s Abraham stands outside the ethical (det Ethiske), so the sovereign grounds legality from the outside, each in the position to make a pure decision about how to act— or so Schmitt’s interpretation seems to go. Yet here Fear and trembling’s portrayal of faith issues a preemptive challenge to Schmitt, capturing Schmitt’s political theology with its accounts of tragic heroes, whom Kierkegaard juxtaposes with the knight of faith in order to critique the former and praise the latter. Accordingly, Kierkegaardian faith does not stand outside morality or legality altogether; faith refuses the conclusion that such an exception is necessary. I conclude by arguing that Fear and trembling’s depiction of faith nonetheless implies a form of decisionism, but one very different than Schmitt’s: the single individual decides whether social living requires a Schmittian decision or not.

Ämnesord

HUMANIORA  -- Filosofi, etik och religion -- Religionsvetenskap (hsv//swe)
HUMANITIES  -- Philosophy, Ethics and Religion -- Religious Studies (hsv//eng)
HUMANIORA  -- Filosofi, etik och religion -- Idé- och lärdomshistoria (hsv//swe)
HUMANITIES  -- Philosophy, Ethics and Religion -- History of Ideas (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Kierkegaard
Schmitt
political theology
faith
Christianity
idealism
realism
decisionism
exception

Publikations- och innehållstyp

kap (ämneskategori)
ref (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy