SwePub
Tyck till om SwePub Sök här!
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

WFRF:(Kamat Ashish M)
 

Search: WFRF:(Kamat Ashish M) > International Socie...

International Society of Urological Pathology Expert Opinion on Grading of Urothelial Carcinoma

van der Kwast, Theo (author)
Princess Margaret Hospital University of Toronto
Liedberg, Fredrik (author)
Lund University,Lunds universitet,Urologi - blåscancer, Malmö,Forskargrupper vid Lunds universitet,LUCC: Lunds universitets cancercentrum,Övriga starka forskningsmiljöer,Urology - urothelial cancer, Malmö,Lund University Research Groups,LUCC: Lund University Cancer Centre,Other Strong Research Environments,Skåne University Hospital
Black, Peter C. (author)
University of British Columbia
show more...
Kamat, Ashish (author)
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
van Rhijn, Bas W.G. (author)
Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital
Algaba, Ferran (author)
Autonomous University of Barcelona
Berman, David M. (author)
Queen's University at Kingston
Hartmann, Arndt (author)
Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg
Lopez-Beltran, Antonio (author)
University of Córdoba, Spain
Samaratunga, Hemamali (author)
Aquesta Uropathology,University of Queensland
Varma, Murali (author)
University Hospital of Wales
Cheng, Liang (author)
Indiana University
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Elsevier BV, 2022
2022
English.
In: European Urology Focus. - : Elsevier BV. - 2405-4569. ; 8:2, s. 438-446
  • Research review (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Context: Grading is the mainstay for treatment decisions for patients with non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Objective: To determine the requirements for an optimal grading system for NMIBC via expert opinion. Evidence acquisition: A multidisciplinary working group established by the International Society of Urological Pathology reviewed available clinical, histopathological, and molecular evidence for an optimal grading system for bladder cancer. Evidence synthesis: Bladder cancer grading is a continuum and five different grading systems based on historical grounds could be envisaged. Splitting of the World Health Organization (WHO) 2004 low-grade class for NMIBC lacks diagnostic reproducibility and molecular-genetic support, while showing little difference in progression rate. Subdividing the clinically heterogeneous WHO 2004 high-grade class for NMIBC into intermediate and high risk categories using the WHO 1973 grading is supported by both clinical and molecular-genetic findings. Grading criteria for the WHO 1973 scheme were detailed on the basis of literature findings and expert opinion. Conclusions: Splitting of the WHO 2004 high-grade category into WHO 1973 grade 2 and 3 subsets is recommended. Provision of more detailed histological criteria for the WHO 1973 grading might facilitate the general acceptance of a hybrid four-tiered grading system or—as a preferred option—a more reproducible three-tiered system distinguishing low-, intermediate (high)-, and high-grade NMIBC. Patient summary: Improvement of the current systems for grading bladder cancer may result in better informed treatment decisions for patients with bladder cancer. A three-tiered grading system for non–muscle invasive bladder cancer derived by splitting the heterogeneous World Health Organization (WHO) 2004 high-grade category into WHO 1973 grade 2 and 3 subsets is recommended, as this may result in more informed treatment decisions.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Cancer och onkologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Cancer and Oncology (hsv//eng)
MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Urologi och njurmedicin (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Urology and Nephrology (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Bladder cancer
Expert opinion
Grading system
Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer
Pathology
WHO 1973
WHO 2004

Publication and Content Type

for (subject category)
ref (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view