SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Schröter Barbara)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Schröter Barbara) > Uncovering power as...

Uncovering power asymmetries in North-South research collaborations – An example from sustainability research in Tanzania

Choquez-Millan, Maria Fresia (författare)
Humboldt University of Berlin,Leibniz-Zentrum fur Agrarlandschaftsforschung (ZALF) e. V.
Lechtape, Charlotte Luise (författare)
Humboldt University of Berlin,Leibniz-Zentrum fur Agrarlandschaftsforschung (ZALF) e. V.
Löhr, Katharina (författare)
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis,Leibniz-Zentrum fur Agrarlandschaftsforschung (ZALF) e. V.
visa fler...
Schröter, Barbara (författare)
Lund University,Lunds universitet,LUCSUS,Samhällsvetenskapliga institutioner och centrumbildningar,Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten,LUCSUS (Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies),Departments of Administrative, Economic and Social Sciences,Faculty of Social Sciences,Leibniz-Zentrum fur Agrarlandschaftsforschung (ZALF) e. V.
Graef, Frieder (författare)
Leibniz-Zentrum fur Agrarlandschaftsforschung (ZALF) e. V.
visa färre...
Humboldt University of Berlin Leibniz-Zentrum fur Agrarlandschaftsforschung (ZALF) e V. (creator_code:org_t)
2024
2024
Engelska.
Ingår i: Futures. - 0016-3287. ; 156
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • North - South collaboration between scientists and collaborators is increasingly prominent and promoted in research. This study examines power dynamics within a North-South research collaboration project conducted between institutions in Tanzania and Germany. The research design is guided by postcolonial considerations of knowledge production and seeks to amplify underrepresented voices from the South. The analysis reveals power manifestations in project setup, processes, and outcomes, through three perspectives: resources, social relations, and discourses. The study confirms the prevailing impression of the Northern partner as the donor and conceptualizer, directing the research path, while the Southern partner remains in a peripheral position as the local implementor. Both parties benefit from the collaboration, but the Northern partner gains more in terms of academic recognition and reproduction, furthering the asymmetrical power distance. This study concludes that to approach the ideal mutual knowledge co-production, collaborations should reconsider funding structures, question ways of knowing, increase the importance of equal capacity building, and challenge established Western academic knowledge production structures.

Ämnesord

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Annan samhällsvetenskap -- Tvärvetenskapliga studier inom samhällsvetenskap (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Other Social Sciences -- Social Sciences Interdisciplinary (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Capacity building
International collaboration
Knowledge co-production
North-South research
Power asymmetries in academia
Research for development

Publikations- och innehållstyp

art (ämneskategori)
ref (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

  • Futures (Sök värdpublikationen i LIBRIS)

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy