SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

id:"swepub:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:cc1d369f-99d6-4d3d-b11f-6096aa7621b3"
 

Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:cc1d369f-99d6-4d3d-b11f-6096aa7621b3" > Consensus on revise...

  • Harmsen, M. J.Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (författare)

Consensus on revised definitions of Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) features of adenomyosis : results of modified Delphi procedure

  • Artikel/kapitelEngelska2022

Förlag, utgivningsår, omfång ...

  • 2022-07
  • Wiley,2022

Nummerbeteckningar

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:cc1d369f-99d6-4d3d-b11f-6096aa7621b3
  • https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/cc1d369f-99d6-4d3d-b11f-6096aa7621b3URI
  • https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.24786DOI

Kompletterande språkuppgifter

  • Språk:engelska
  • Sammanfattning på:engelska

Ingår i deldatabas

Klassifikation

  • Ämneskategori:art swepub-publicationtype
  • Ämneskategori:ref swepub-contenttype

Anmärkningar

  • Objectives: To evaluate whether the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) features of adenomyosis need to be better defined and, if deemed necessary, to reach consensus on the updated definitions. Methods: A modified Delphi procedure was performed among European gynecologists with expertise in ultrasound diagnosis of adenomyosis. To identify MUSA features that might need revision, 15 two-dimensional (2D) video recordings (four recordings also included three-dimensional (3D) still images) of transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) examinations of the uterus were presented in the first Delphi round (online questionnaire). Experts were asked to confirm or refute the presence of each of the nine MUSA features of adenomyosis (described in the original MUSA consensus statement) in each of the 15 videoclips and to provide comments. In the second Delphi round (online questionnaire), the results of the first round and suggestions for revision of MUSA features were shared with the experts before they were asked to assess a new set of 2D and 3D still images of TVS examinations and to provide feedback on the proposed revisions. A third Delphi round (virtual group meeting) was conducted to discuss and reach final consensus on revised definitions of MUSA features. Consensus was predefined as at least 66.7% agreement between experts. Results: Of 18 invited experts, 16 agreed to participate in the Delphi procedure. Eleven experts completed and four experts partly finished the first round. The experts identified a need for more detailed definitions of some MUSA features. They recommended use of 3D ultrasound to optimize visualization of the junctional zone. Fifteen experts participated in the second round and reached consensus on the presence or absence of ultrasound features of adenomyosis in most of the still images. Consensus was reached for all revised definitions except those for subendometrial lines and buds and interrupted junctional zone. Thirteen experts joined the online meeting, in which they discussed and agreed on final revisions of the MUSA definitions. There was consensus on the need to distinguish between direct features of adenomyosis, i.e. features indicating presence of ectopic endometrial tissue in the myometrium, and indirect features, i.e. features reflecting changes in the myometrium secondary to presence of endometrial tissue in the myometrium. Myometrial cysts, hyperechogenic islands and echogenic subendometrial lines and buds were classified unanimously as direct features of adenomyosis. Globular uterus, asymmetrical myometrial thickening, fan-shaped shadowing, translesional vascularity, irregular junctional zone and interrupted junctional zone were classified as indirect features of adenomyosis. Conclusion: Consensus between gynecologists with expertise in ultrasound diagnosis of adenomyosis was achieved regarding revised definitions of the MUSA features of adenomyosis and on the classification of MUSA features as direct or indirect signs of adenomyosis.

Ämnesord och genrebeteckningar

Biuppslag (personer, institutioner, konferenser, titlar ...)

  • Van den Bosch, T.University Hospitals Leuven,Catholic University of Leuven (författare)
  • de Leeuw, R. A.Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (författare)
  • Dueholm, M.Aarhus University Hospital (författare)
  • Exacoustos, C.University of Rome Tor Vergata (författare)
  • Valentin, L.Lund University,Lunds universitet,Obstetrisk, gynekologisk och prenatal ultraljudsdiagnostik,Forskargrupper vid Lunds universitet,Obstetric, Gynaecological and Prenatal Ultrasound Research,Lund University Research Groups,Skåne University Hospital(Swepub:lu)obst-lva (författare)
  • Hehenkamp, W. J.K.Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (författare)
  • Groenman, F.Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (författare)
  • De Bruyn, C.Antwerp University Hospital,Catholic University of Leuven (författare)
  • Rasmussen, C.Aarhus University Hospital (författare)
  • Lazzeri, L.University of Siena (författare)
  • Jokubkiene, L.Skåne University Hospital(Swepub:lu)obst-ljo (författare)
  • Jurkovic, D.University College London Hospital (författare)
  • Naftalin, J.University College London Hospital (författare)
  • Tellum, T.Oslo university hospital (författare)
  • Bourne, T.Catholic University of Leuven,Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital (författare)
  • Timmerman, D.Catholic University of Leuven,University Hospitals Leuven (författare)
  • Huirne, J. A.F.Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (författare)
  • Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamUniversity Hospitals Leuven (creator_code:org_t)

Sammanhörande titlar

  • Ingår i:Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology: Wiley60:1, s. 118-1310960-76921469-0705

Internetlänk

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy