Comparative study of four different assays for the detection of binding antibodies against interferon-beta

Background Binding antibodies (BAB) against interferon-β (IFNβ) are often determined as screening assays before performing an expensive and elaborate neutralizing antibody (NAB) test. Methods In this study, we compared four BAB tests, a western blot (WB), a direct binding enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (dELISA), a capture ELISA (cELISA), and a commercial enzyme immuno-assay (EIA) in 325 multiple sclerosis patients with and without neutralizing antibodies to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity to detect NAB by receiver operating characteristics analysis. Results The area under the curve (AUC) values were 0.907 for the dELISA, 0.925 for the cELISA, and 0.776 for the EIA ( P < 0.0001 for all). At a sensitivity of 95%, the specificity was approximately 30% in the dELISA, 55% in the cELISA, and 13% in the EIA. The WB as a qualitative BAB detection method had a given sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 55%. There was a strong and significant correlation between high NAB titers (>500 neutralizing units [NU]) and titers obtained by all quantitative BAB assays. However, low to medium NAB titers (20–500 NU) did not significantly correlate with BAB titers. Conclusion We conclude that the cELISA seems to be most suitable for NAB screening, but BAB titers cannot reliably predict NAB titers.

Ingår i:Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England): SAGE Publications14:6, s. 830-8361352-45851477-0970

Av författaren/redakt...: Gneiss, C; Brugger, M; Millonig, A; Fogdell-Hahn, A; Rudzki, D; Hillert, J; visa fler...; Berger, T; Reindl, M; Deisenhammer, F; visa färre...

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.