SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

WFRF:(Leavy B)
 

Search: WFRF:(Leavy B) > Predictors of impro...

Predictors of improved balance performance in persons with Parkinson's disease following a training intervention: analysis of data from an effectiveness-implementation trial

Joseph, C (author)
Karolinska Institutet
Leavy, B (author)
Karolinska Institutet
Franzen, E (author)
Karolinska Institutet
 (creator_code:org_t)
2020-05-03
2020
English.
In: Clinical rehabilitation. - : SAGE Publications. - 1477-0873 .- 0269-2155. ; 34:6, s. 837-844
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • (1) To determine associated factors of improved balance performance after a 10-week HiBalance intervention period, and (2) to determine effects of the programme on modifiable factors found above, considering both groups. Design: Pre-posttest substudy founded on the outcomes evaluation of an effectiveness-implementation trial. Participants: Sixty-one participants were allocated the HiBalance training, while 56 were controls. Intervention: Participants received a 10-week, two times weekly, progressive balance training, that is, HiBalance intervention, led by physical therapists. The intervention was group based and gradually incorporated dual-tasking over the training period. Participants also performed, unsupervised, a 1×/week home exercise programme. Main outcome: The Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) assessed balance performance, and those having improved by ⩾2 points were classified as positive responders. Balance confidence was the secondary outcome. Results: Fifty-three (87%) participants completed the intervention and 32 (60%) improved their balance scores by ⩾2 points in the intervention group, with 11 (24%) in the control group. The multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed two independently associated factors of improved balance, which included balance confidence (odds ratio (OR) = 0.95; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.90–0.99) and attendance of ⩾80% of training sessions (OR = 10.10; 95% CI = 1.71–59.60). The final model demonstrated good fit and acceptable discrimination (area under the curve = 0.84). Secondary analysis revealed a fair relationship (Rho = 0.30; P = 0.044) between improvements in balance confidence and balance performance in the intervention but not control group. Conclusion: Two personal factors were significantly associated with a higher likelihood of improvement in clinically measured balance performance. The HiBalance intervention appears to benefit those with lower balance confidence.

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Joseph, C
Leavy, B
Franzen, E
Articles in the publication
Clinical rehabil ...
By the university
Karolinska Institutet

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view