Comparison of Regularized Reconstruction and Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization Reconstruction in the Diagnostics of Prostate Cancer Using Digital Time-of-Flight 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Imaging

↓ Direkt till sidans innehåll
↓ Direkt till sidans sekundära innehåll (sidomenyn)

Sökning: WFRF:(Jonmarker S) > Comparison of Regul...

Jonmarker, OKarolinska Institutet (författare)

Comparison of Regularized Reconstruction and Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization Reconstruction in the Diagnostics of Prostate Cancer Using Digital Time-of-Flight 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Imaging

Artikel/kapitelEngelska2021

Förlag, utgivningsår, omfång ...

2021-03-31
MDPI AG,2021

Nummerbeteckningar

LIBRIS-ID:oai:prod.swepub.kib.ki.se:146527363
http://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:146527363URI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11040630DOI

Kompletterande språkuppgifter

Språk:engelska
Sammanfattning på:engelska

Ingår i deldatabas

SwePubSwePub

Klassifikation

Ämneskategori:ref swepub-contenttype
Ämneskategori:art swepub-publicationtype

Anmärkningar

In prostate cancer, the early detection of distant spread has been shown to be of importance. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-binding radionuclides in positron emission tomography (PET) is a promising method for precise disease staging. PET diagnostics depend on image reconstruction techniques, and ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) is the established standard. Block sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM) is a more recent reconstruction algorithm and may produce fewer equivocal findings and better lesion detection. Methods: 68Ga PSMA-11 PET/CT scans of patients with de novo or suspected recurrent prostate cancer were retrospectively reformatted using both the OSEM and BSREM algorithms. The lesions were counted and categorized by three radiologists. The intra-class correlation (ICC) and Cohen’s kappa for the inter-rater reliability were calculated. Results: Sixty-one patients were reviewed. BSREM identified slightly fewer lesions overall and fewer equivocal findings. ICC was excellent with regards to definitive lymph nodes and bone metastasis identification and poor with regards to equivocal metastasis irrespective of the reconstruction algorithm. The median Cohen’s kappa were 0.66, 0.74, 0.61 and 0.43 for OSEM and 0.61, 0.63, 0.66 and 0.53 for BSREM, with respect to the tumor, local lymph nodes, metastatic lymph nodes and bone metastasis detection, respectively. Conclusions: BSREM in the setting of 68Ga PMSA PET staging or restaging is comparable to OSEM.

Biuppslag (personer, institutioner, konferenser, titlar ...)

Axelsson, RKarolinska Institutet (författare)
Nilsson, TKarolinska Institutet (författare)
Gabrielson, SKarolinska Institutet (författare)
Karolinska Institutet (creator_code:org_t)

Sammanhörande titlar

Ingår i:Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland): MDPI AG11:42075-4418

Internetlänk

Hitta via bibliotek

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) (Sök värdpublikationen i LIBRIS)

Till lärosätets databas

Hitta mer i SwePub

Av författaren/redakt...: Jonmarker, O; Axelsson, R; Nilsson, T; Gabrielson, S

Artiklar i publikationen: Diagnostics (Bas ...

Av lärosätet: Karolinska Institutet

Sök utanför SwePub

Sök vidare i:: Google; Google Book Search; Google Scholar

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

LIBRIS.kb.se