The Effectiveness of Surgical Methods for Trismus Release at Least 6 Months After Head and Neck Cancer Treatment: Systematic Review

↓ Direkt till sidans innehåll
↓ Direkt till sidans sekundära innehåll (sidomenyn)

Search: WFRF:(Smeets M) > The Effectiveness o...

Details
MARC

Smeets, M (author)

The Effectiveness of Surgical Methods for Trismus Release at Least 6 Months After Head and Neck Cancer Treatment: Systematic Review

Article/chapterEnglish2021

Publisher, publication year, extent ...

2022-01-21
Frontiers Media SA,2021

Numbers

LIBRIS-ID:oai:prod.swepub.kib.ki.se:235128526
http://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:235128526URI
https://doi.org/10.3389/froh.2021.810288DOI

Supplementary language notes

Language:English
Summary in:English

Part of subdatabase

SwePubSwePub

Classification

Subject category:vet swepub-contenttype
Subject category:art swepub-publicationtype

Notes

The objective of this systematic review was to identify the different surgical treatment modalities of severe trismus after head and neck squamous cell cancer treatment.MethodsAn electronic literature database search was conducted in Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and OpenGrey to determine articles published up to September 2021. Two observers independently assessed the identified papers for eligibility according to PRISMA guidelines. The inclusion criteria were trismus after head and neck squamous cell cancer with consecutive treatment, detailed description of the surgical procedure for trismus release, description of the initial treatment, at least 6 months between initial cancer treatment and trismus release surgery, a minimal follow-up (FU) of 6 months, and availability of full text. The quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. A subanalysis of the maximal mouth opening (MMO) was performed using a mixed-effect model.ResultsA total of 8,607 unique articles were screened for eligibility, 69 full texts were reviewed, and 3 studies, with a total of 46 cases, were selected based on the predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Three treatment strategies were identified for trismus release (1) free flap reconstruction (FFR), (2) coronoidectomy (CN), and (3) myotomy (MT). There was a clear improvement for all treatment modalities. A quantitative analysis showed a beneficial effect of CN (mean 24.02 ± 15.02 mm) in comparison with FFR (mean 19.88 ± 13.97 mm) and MT (mean 18.38 ± 13.22 mm) (P < 0.01*). An increased gain in MMO after trismus release was found if no primary resection was performed (P = 0.014*). Two studies included in the analysis had an intermediate risk of bias and one had a low risk of bias.ConclusionCurrently available reports suggest a low threshold for performing a CN compared with FFR and MT. There is a need for high-quality randomized controlled trials with carefully selected and standardized outcome measures.

Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)

Croonenborghs, TM (author)
Van Dessel, J (author)
Politis, C (author)
Jacobs, RKarolinska Institutet (author)
Bila, M (author)
Karolinska Institutet (creator_code:org_t)

Related titles

In:Frontiers in oral health: Frontiers Media SA2, s. 810288-2673-4842

Internet link

Find in a library

Frontiers in oral health (Search for host publication in LIBRIS)

To the university's database

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor: Smeets, M; Croonenborghs, T ...; Van Dessel, J; Politis, C; Jacobs, R; Bila, M

Articles in the publication: Frontiers in ora ...

By the university: Karolinska Institutet

Search outside SwePub

Extend your search to:: Google; Google Book Search; Google Scholar

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

LIBRIS.kb.se