SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

WFRF:(Gepner B. D.)
 

Search: WFRF:(Gepner B. D.) > Comparison of human...

Comparison of human body models in frontal crashes with reclined seatback

Gepner, B. D. (author)
University of Virginia
Draper, D. (author)
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München,Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
Mroz, K. (author)
Autoliv AB, Sweden
show more...
Richardson, R. (author)
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München,Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
Östling, Martin (author)
Autoliv AB, Sweden
Pipkorn, Bengt, 1963 (author)
Autoliv AB, Sweden,Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
Forman, Jason (author)
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München,Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
Kerrigan, J. R. (author)
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München,Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2019
2019
English.
In: Conference proceedings International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury, IRCOBI. - 2235-3151. ; , s. 293-307
  • Conference paper (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Reclined seating configurations, relevant to the future of Autonomous Driving Systems is likely to challenge the current state-of-the-art restraint systems. Human body models (HBM) offer an attractive tool to support the design process, however their validity in the reclined scenario remains questionable. The goal of this study is to compare the response of selected HBMs in the frontal, reclined scenario, while utilizing a new prototype restraint system. A sled model with a generic seat, 50 deg seatback recline angle and a prototype 3-point belt system was used in this study. Four different male HBMs were compared, the Global Human Body Model Consortium (GHBMC) simplified occupant model (GHBMC-S), the GHBMC detailed model (GHBMC-D), Total Human Model for Safety SAFER (THUMS-S) model, and THUMS-v5 model. All HBMs showed good pelvis engagement, except GHBMC-D that submarined under the lap belt. Additionally, large differences were observed in pelvis and lumbar spine response between GHBMC and THUMS family models. Since no relevant PMHS data is currently available, it is impossible to evaluate the biofidelity of these models in the reclined scenarios. Evaluating the relative biofidelity of these models can only be accomplished with experimental data capturing detailed 3D skeletal kinematics and all the boundary forces necessary for model evaluation.

Subject headings

NATURVETENSKAP  -- Data- och informationsvetenskap -- Bioinformatik (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Computer and Information Sciences -- Bioinformatics (hsv//eng)
TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER  -- Maskinteknik -- Farkostteknik (hsv//swe)
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY  -- Mechanical Engineering -- Vehicle Engineering (hsv//eng)
TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER  -- Elektroteknik och elektronik -- Inbäddad systemteknik (hsv//swe)
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY  -- Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information Engineering -- Embedded Systems (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Submarining
PMHS
Recline
HBM
Restraint

Publication and Content Type

kon (subject category)
ref (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view