SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Nilsson Tomas 1983 )
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Nilsson Tomas 1983 ) > Modelling incinerat...

Modelling incineration for more accurate comparisons to recycling in PEF and LCA

Ekvall, Tomas, 1963 (författare)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
Gottfridsson, Marie (författare)
IVL Svenska Miljöinstitutet AB,IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute
Nellström, Maja (författare)
IVL Svenska Miljöinstitutet AB,IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute
visa fler...
Nilsson, Johan (författare)
IVL Svenska Miljöinstitutet AB,IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute
Rydberg, Maria, 1983 (författare)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
Rydberg, Tomas, 1962 (författare)
IVL Svenska Miljöinstitutet AB,IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Elsevier BV, 2021
2021
Engelska.
Ingår i: Waste Management. - : Elsevier BV. - 0956-053X .- 1879-2456. ; 136, s. 153-161
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • When recycling is beneficial for the environment, results from a life cycle assessment (LCA) should give incentives to collection for recycling and also to the use of recycled material in new products. Many approaches for modeling recycling in LCA assign part of the environmental benefits of recycling to the product where the recycled material is used. For example, the Circular Footprint Formula in the framework for Product Environmental Footprints (PEF) assigns less than 45% of the benefits of recycling to a polymer product sent to recycling. Our calculations indicate that this creates an incorrect climate incentive for incineration of renewable LDPE, when the recovered energy substitutes energy sources with 100–300% more climate impact than the Swedish average district heat and electricity. The risk of incorrect incentives can be reduced through allocating part of the net benefits of energy recovery to the life cycle where the energy is used; we propose this part can be 60% for Sweden, but probably less in countries without a district-heating network. Alternatively, the LCA can include the alternative treatment of waste that is displaced at the incinerator by waste from the investigated product. These solutions both make the LCA more balanced and consistent. The allocation factor 0.6 at incineration almost eliminates the risk of incorrect incentives in a PEF of renewable polymers. However, the focus of LCA on one product at a time might still make it insufficient to guide recycling, which requires concerted actions between actors in different life cycles.

Ämnesord

TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER  -- Naturresursteknik -- Annan naturresursteknik (hsv//swe)
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY  -- Environmental Engineering -- Other Environmental Engineering (hsv//eng)
TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER  -- Naturresursteknik -- Miljöledning (hsv//swe)
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY  -- Environmental Engineering -- Environmental Management (hsv//eng)
TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER  -- Naturresursteknik -- Energisystem (hsv//swe)
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY  -- Environmental Engineering -- Energy Systems (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Methodology
Factor B
Life cycle assessment
Product Environmental Footprint
Energy recovery
Waste management

Publikations- och innehållstyp

art (ämneskategori)
ref (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy