SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Victor Trent 1968)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Victor Trent 1968) > Automation Expectat...

Automation Expectation Mismatch: Incorrect Prediction Despite Eyes on Threat and Hands on Wheel

Victor, Trent, 1968 (författare)
Volvo Cars
Tivesten, Emma, 1968 (författare)
Volvo Cars
Gustavsson, Pär (författare)
Volvo Cars
visa fler...
Johansson, Joel, 1978 (författare)
Volvo Cars
Sangberg, Fredrik (författare)
Volvo Cars
Ljung Aust, Mikael, 1973 (författare)
Volvo Cars
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2018-08-10
2018
Engelska.
Ingår i: Human Factors. - : SAGE Publications. - 1547-8181 .- 0018-7208. ; 60:8, s. 1095-1116
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Objective:  The aim of this study was to understand how to secure driver supervision engagement and conflict intervention performance while using highly reliable (but not perfect) automation. Background:  Securing driver engagement—by mitigating irony of automation (i.e., the better the automation, the less attention drivers will pay to traffic and the system, and the less capable they will be to resume control) and by communicating system limitations to avoid mental model misconceptions—is a major challenge in the human factors literature. Method:  One hundred six drivers participated in three test-track experiments in which we studied driver intervention response to conflicts after driving highly reliable but supervised automation. After 30 min, a conflict occurred wherein the lead vehicle cut out of lane to reveal a conflict object in the form of either a stationary car or a garbage bag. Results:  Supervision reminders effectively maintained drivers’ eyes on path and hands on wheel. However, neither these reminders nor explicit instructions on system limitations and supervision responsibilities prevented 28% (21/76) of drivers from crashing with their eyes on the conflict object (car or bag). Conclusion:  The results uncover the important role of expectation mismatches, showing that a key component of driver engagement is cognitive (understanding the need for action), rather than purely visual (looking at the threat), or having hands on wheel. Application:  Automation needs to be designed either so that it does not rely on the driver or so that the driver unmistakably understands that it is an assistance system that needs an active driver to lead and share control.

Ämnesord

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Psykologi (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Psychology (hsv//eng)
TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER  -- Annan teknik -- Övrig annan teknik (hsv//swe)
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY  -- Other Engineering and Technologies -- Other Engineering and Technologies not elsewhere specified (hsv//eng)
MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Hälsovetenskap -- Arbetsmedicin och miljömedicin (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Health Sciences -- Occupational Health and Environmental Health (hsv//eng)
NATURVETENSKAP  -- Annan naturvetenskap (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Other Natural Sciences (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

human–automation interaction
attentional processes
mental models
shared mental models
accident analysis
autonomous driving

Publikations- och innehållstyp

art (ämneskategori)
ref (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy