SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Torkar Richard 1971)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Torkar Richard 1971) > Estimating Return o...

Estimating Return on Investment for GUI Test Automation Frameworks

Dobslaw, Felix, 1983 (författare)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
Feldt, Robert, 1972 (författare)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
Michaëlsson, David (författare)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
visa fler...
Haar, Patrik (författare)
Gomes, Francisco, 1987 (författare)
Göteborgs universitet,University of Gothenburg
Torkar, Richard, 1971 (författare)
Göteborgs universitet,University of Gothenburg
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
ISBN 9781728149813
2019
2019
Engelska.
Ingår i: Proceedings - International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering, ISSRE. - 1071-9458. - 9781728149813 ; 30
  • Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Automated graphical user interface (GUI) tests can reduce manual testing activities and increase test frequency. This motivates the conversion of manual test cases into automated GUI tests. However, it is not clear whether such automation is cost-effective given that GUI automation scripts add to the code base and demand maintenance as a system evolves. In this paper, we introduce a method for estimating maintenance cost and Return on Investment (ROI) for Automated GUI Testing (AGT). The method utilizes the existing source code change history and has the potential to be used for the evaluation of other testing or quality assurance automation technologies. We evaluate the method for a real-world, industrial software system and compare two fundamentally different AGT frameworks, namely Selenium and EyeAutomate, to estimate and compare their ROI. We also report on their defect-finding capabilities and usability. The quantitative data is complemented by interviews with employees at the company the study has been conducted at. The method was successfully applied, and estimated maintenance cost and ROI for both frameworks are reported. Overall, the study supports earlier results showing that implementation time is the leading cost for introducing AGT. The findings further suggest that, while EyeAutomate tests are significantly faster to implement, Selenium tests require more of a programming background but less maintenance.

Ämnesord

TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER  -- Maskinteknik -- Tillförlitlighets- och kvalitetsteknik (hsv//swe)
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY  -- Mechanical Engineering -- Reliability and Maintenance (hsv//eng)
NATURVETENSKAP  -- Data- och informationsvetenskap -- Programvaruteknik (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Computer and Information Sciences -- Software Engineering (hsv//eng)
NATURVETENSKAP  -- Data- och informationsvetenskap -- Datavetenskap (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Computer and Information Sciences -- Computer Sciences (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Test Automation
Visual GUI Testing
EyeAutomate
Selenium
Graphical User Interface

Publikations- och innehållstyp

kon (ämneskategori)
ref (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy