Sökning: AMNE:(LANTBRUKSVETENSKAPER Veterinärmedicin) >
Scientific Opinion ...
-
Berg, LottaSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences,Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet,Institutionen för husdjurens miljö och hälsa (HMH),Department of Animal Environment and Health
(författare)
Scientific Opinion on the assessment of studies on the use of carbon dioxide for stunning rabbits
- Artikel/kapitelEngelska2015
Förlag, utgivningsår, omfång ...
-
Wiley,2015
-
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma,2024
Nummerbeteckningar
-
LIBRIS-ID:oai:slubar.slu.se:65364
-
https://res.slu.se/id/publ/65364URI
-
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4022DOI
Kompletterande språkuppgifter
-
Språk:engelska
-
Sammanfattning på:engelska
Ingår i deldatabas
Klassifikation
-
Ämneskategori:ref swepub-contenttype
-
Ämneskategori:art swepub-publicationtype
Anmärkningar
-
The EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW Panel) was asked by the European Commission to deliver a scientific opinion on two studies concerned with the use of carbon dioxide for stunning rabbits. The European Commission had received from the Spanish authorities a report of a study entitled ‘Carbon dioxide stunning of rabbits' and another study entitled ‘Stunning of rabbits with carbon dioxide', provided as a complement to the first study. The latter was undertaken in a commercial abattoir where a commercial carbon dioxide stunner was installed. The results of electrocardiography and animal-based measures (nasal discomfort and vocalisation) produced in the experimental slaughterhouse study clearly indicated that the rabbits were subjected to pain and suffering prior to the loss of consciousness. The data presented do not describe stable, controlled or repeatable experimental conditions. The statistical tests used to analyse the data were not appropriate. The study in the commercial abattoir was not based on sound scientific conclusions resulting from the experimental slaughterhouse study. For all of these reasons, the submitted studies did not meet the minimum criteria for eligibility in the EFSA guidance on the assessment criteria for studies evaluating the effectiveness of stunning interventions. Therefore, they were not further assessed.
Ämnesord och genrebeteckningar
Biuppslag (personer, institutioner, konferenser, titlar ...)
-
Vågsholm, IvarSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences,Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet,Inst för biomedicin och veterinär folkhälsovetenskap,Department of Biomedical Science and Veterinary Public Health(Swepub:slu)48570
(författare)
-
Sveriges lantbruksuniversitetInstitutionen för husdjurens miljö och hälsa (HMH)
(creator_code:org_t)
-
Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet
Sammanhörande titlar
-
Ingår i:EFSA Journal: Wiley131831-4732
Internetlänk
Hitta via bibliotek
Till lärosätets databas