SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

id:"swepub:oai:slubar.slu.se:76038"
 

Search: id:"swepub:oai:slubar.slu.se:76038" > Flaws and criteria ...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist
  • Kirchmann, HolgerSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences,Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet,Institutionen för mark och miljö,Department of Soil and Environment (author)

Flaws and criteria for design and evaluation of comparative organic and conventional cropping systems

  • Article/chapterEnglish2016

Publisher, publication year, extent ...

  • Elsevier BV,2016
  • Elsevier,2024

Numbers

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:slubar.slu.se:76038
  • https://res.slu.se/id/publ/76038URI
  • https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.11.006DOI

Supplementary language notes

  • Language:English
  • Summary in:English

Part of subdatabase

Classification

  • Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype
  • Subject category:for swepub-publicationtype

Notes

  • In this review, comparisons between organic and conventional cropping systems are discussed. Publications from four topics, crop yields, carbon sequestration, biological diversity and nitrogen leaching were selected as examples to point out pitfalls and shortcomings in comparative analysis that can weaken or even disqualify evaluations. Inconsistent results between different comparative studies were found to be pseudo-contradictions. As the experimental design of comparative organic and conventional cropping systems often is biased in some aspects, suitable denominators for comparative assessment are discussed (ratios per area, per product and per land demand for the same amount of product). Conditions for equitable evaluations are outlined in order to avoid biased design, inappropriate interpretations and flawed conclusions. We stress that respecting at least three stringency criteria will help to ensure the scientific quality of data interpretation of comparative studies: similar soil fertility status at start, comparable type of crop production, and quantification of off-farm organic and nutrient input. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.orgilicenses/by/4.0/).

Subject headings and genre

Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)

  • Kätterer, ThomasSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences,Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet,Institutionen för ekologi,Department of Ecology(Swepub:slu)48437 (author)
  • Bergström, LarsSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences,Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet,Institutionen för mark och miljö,Department of Soil and Environment(Swepub:slu)50388 (author)
  • Börjesson, GunnarSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences,Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet,Institutionen för mark och miljö,Department of Soil and Environment(Swepub:slu)49477 (author)
  • Bolinder, MartinSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences,Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet,Institutionen för ekologi,Department of Ecology(Swepub:slu)50140 (author)
  • Sveriges lantbruksuniversitetInstitutionen för mark och miljö (creator_code:org_t)
  • Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet

Related titles

  • In:Field Crops Research: Elsevier BV186, s. 99-1060378-42901872-6852

Internet link

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view